Comparison Overview

China Mobile International Limited

VS

Axiata

China Mobile International Limited

Level 30, Tower 1, Kowloon Commerce Centre, 51 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Unit 9-18, Level 12, Tower 1, Kowloon Commerce Centre, 51 Kwai Cheong Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-08
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cmi.chinamobile.com

China Mobile International Limited (CMI) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Mobile, mainly responsible for the operation of China Mobile's international business. In order to provide better services to meet the growing demand in the international telecommunications market, China Mobile established a subsidiary, CMI, in December 2010. CMI currently has 90+ terrestrial and submarine cable resources worldwide, with a total international transmission bandwidth of over 150T, and a total of 310 overseas PoPs. With Hong Kong, China as its launchpad, CMI has significantly accelerated global IDC development, creating a strong network for data centre cloudification. Leveraging the strong support by China Mobile, CMI is a trusted partner that provides comprehensive international information services and solutions to international enterprises, carriers and mobile users. Headquartered in Hong Kong, China, CMI has expanded its footprint in 39 countries and regions.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 1,719
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Axiata

Level 23, Axiata Tower, 9 Jalan Stesen Sentral 5 KL Sentral, Kuala Lumpur 50470, MY
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.axiata.com

AXIATA GROUP BERHAD 242188-H (199201010685) In pursuit of its vision to be The Next Generation Digital Champion, Axiata is a diversified telecommunications and digital conglomerate operating Digital Telcos, Digital Businesses and Infrastructure businesses across a footprint spanning ASEAN and South Asia. The Group has controlling stakes in market-leading mobile and fixed operators in the region including 'XL’ and ‘Link Net' in Indonesia, 'Dialog' in Sri Lanka, 'Robi' in Bangladesh, and 'Smart' in Cambodia while 'CelcomDigi' in Malaysia is a Key Associate Company. Axiata’s regional digital business verticals comprise ‘Boost’ a fintech company, and ‘ADA’, a digital analytics and AI company. 'EDOTCO' is among the top 10 independent TowerCos globally, operating in nine countries to deliver telecommunications infrastructure services. As a committed and long-term investor, the Group actively supports and drives young talent development; community outreach; as well as climate change initiatives. Axiata's broader goal of Advancing Asia aims to piece together the best in the region in terms of innovation, connectivity and talent to drive digital inclusion and sustainable progress across our markets. Find out more at www.axiata.com

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-mobile-international-limited.jpeg
China Mobile International Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axiata.jpeg
Axiata
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Mobile International Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Axiata
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Mobile International Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Axiata in 2025.

Incident History — China Mobile International Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Mobile International Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Axiata (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Axiata cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-mobile-international-limited.jpeg
China Mobile International Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axiata.jpeg
Axiata
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Mobile International Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Axiata company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Axiata company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China Mobile International Limited company.

In the current year, Axiata company and China Mobile International Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Axiata company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Axiata company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Axiata company nor China Mobile International Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Mobile International Limited company nor Axiata company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Axiata holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

China Mobile International Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Axiata company.

Axiata company employs more people globally than China Mobile International Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Axiata holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Axiata holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Axiata holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Axiata holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Axiata holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Mobile International Limited nor Axiata holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References