Comparison Overview

China Institute in America

VS

U.S. Department of State

China Institute in America

100 Washington St, New York, New York, undefined, 10006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20

Founded in New York City in 1926 by American educators John Dewey, Paul Monroe, and Chinese scholars Hu Shi (胡適) and Kuo Ping-Wen (郭秉文), China Institute in America is an internationally-renowned U.S. nonprofit organization dedicated to deepening the world’s understanding of China through programs in art, business, cuisine, culture, and education.

NAICS: 92812
NAICS Definition: International Affairs
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

U.S. Department of State

2201 C St., NW, Washington, DC, US, 20520
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 800 and 849

The U.S. Department of State is focused on accomplishing America's mission of diplomacy at home and around the world. The U.S. Department of State manages America’s relationships with foreign governments, international organizations, and the people of other countries. U.S. diplomats and Civil Service professionals carry out the President’s foreign policy and help build a more free, prosperous, and secure world. U.S. Department of State employees, with their skills, character and commitment to public service, are the backbone of America's diplomacy. They represent the people and advocate the interests of the U.S. to the rest of the world. The Foreign Service (FS) is dedicated to representing America and responding to the needs of American citizens in other countries. Members of the Foreign Service can be sent to any embassy, consulate, or other diplomatic mission anywhere in the world, at any time, to serve the diplomatic needs of the United States. Civil Service (CS) employees provide in-depth expertise and continuity in accomplishing all aspects of the Department's mission and are involved in virtually every function of the Department. Civil Service employees issue passports, compile and analyze overseas reports, provide logistical support to posts, consult with Congress about foreign policy initiatives and policies, and formulate and manage the budget. Nearly 7,400 Civil Service (CS) employees serve as a stable resource pool in Washington D.C., at Passport Agencies and field offices throughout the United States, and at several Consulates in Mexico. More than 31,000 Foreign Service National (FSN) employees also supplement the personnel requirements of the Department overseas. FSN employees are local residents of the countries in which we maintain diplomatic posts and consulates. They are valued members of our embassy teams, for they provide continuity for the transient American staff and have language and cultural expertise.

NAICS: 92812
NAICS Definition: International Affairs
Employees: 37,160
Subsidiaries: 67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-institute.jpeg
China Institute in America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doscareers.jpeg
U.S. Department of State
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Institute in America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S. Department of State
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Institute in America in 2025.

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Department of State in 2025.

Incident History — China Institute in America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Institute in America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S. Department of State (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of State cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-institute.jpeg
China Institute in America
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerability in Apache HTTP server
Motivation: Espionage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doscareers.jpeg
U.S. Department of State
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: 5G networks, social media platforms
Motivation: Countering global tech and cyber challenges
Blog: Blog

FAQ

U.S. Department of State company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to China Institute in America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

China Institute in America and U.S. Department of State have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, U.S. Department of State company and China Institute in America company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither U.S. Department of State company nor China Institute in America company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither U.S. Department of State company nor China Institute in America company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

China Institute in America company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while U.S. Department of State company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Department of State company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while China Institute in America company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither China Institute in America nor U.S. Department of State holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

U.S. Department of State company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to China Institute in America company.

U.S. Department of State company employs more people globally than China Institute in America company, reflecting its scale as a International Affairs.

Neither China Institute in America nor U.S. Department of State holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor U.S. Department of State holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor U.S. Department of State holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor U.S. Department of State holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor U.S. Department of State holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor U.S. Department of State holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N