Comparison Overview

Hainan Airlines

VS

JetBlue

Hainan Airlines

Comprehensive Office Building No.21,Hainan Airlines Haikou Meilan Base, No.9, Meilan Airport Road, haikou, hainan, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Hainan Airlines holding company was established in 1993 from their main base in Haikou, and continued on to develop seven shipping bases in China with routes covering Asia and radiating into Europe, North America, Oceania and Africa. In all, Hainan Airlines has opened up almost 500 domestic and international flight routes, reaching almost 100 destinations. For over 20 years Hainan Airlines has embraced the concept of “Oriental hospitality” and advocates a “respect for the customer” service spirit. As a world-class aviation enterprise the “cherished experience” brand philosophy isn’t just our business, it’s our calling. Each year, Hainan Airlines provides thousands of passengers with safe, attentive service. We promote tourism, give peace of mind to loved-ones, meet the unique needs of our business travelers, and focus on making your safety and comfort, our priority. Today Hainan Airlines has over 10,000 employees all over the world, each with their own language, experience, and story. HNA cherishes each and every employee's knowledge and wholeheartedly respects each employee’s contribution. Our next milestone at Hainan Airlines is global diversification and the aggressive development of an international perspective. We can offer challenges, passion and possibilities and in return, we need your vision, experience and creativity.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 3,465
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JetBlue

27-01 Queens Plaza North, Long Island City, New York, 11101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

When JetBlue first took flight in February 2000, our founding goal was to bring humanity back to air travel, and over two decades later, we still put our customers, crewmembers and communities at the center of everything we do. Before we even had aircraft to fly, our founders selected five values to guide us, which are safety, caring, integrity, passion and fun. These core values shape our culture and empower our 23,000 crewmembers to deliver a meaningful JetBlue experience to more than 40 million customers that fly with us each year to more than 100 cities across the United States, Latin America, Caribbean, Canada and Europe. We’re proud to be New York's Hometown Airline®, and a leading carrier in Boston, Fort Lauderdale - Hollywood, Los Angeles, Orlando, and San Juan. Please note: If you have concerns or complaints that require response, please visit http://jetblue.com/chat.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 16,257
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-hainan-airlines.jpeg
Hainan Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jetblue-airways.jpeg
JetBlue
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hainan Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JetBlue
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hainan Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JetBlue in 2025.

Incident History — Hainan Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hainan Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JetBlue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JetBlue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-hainan-airlines.jpeg
Hainan Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jetblue-airways.jpeg
JetBlue
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hainan Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JetBlue company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, JetBlue company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hainan Airlines company.

In the current year, JetBlue company and Hainan Airlines company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JetBlue company nor Hainan Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JetBlue company nor Hainan Airlines company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JetBlue company nor Hainan Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hainan Airlines company nor JetBlue company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor JetBlue holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hainan Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to JetBlue company.

JetBlue company employs more people globally than Hainan Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor JetBlue holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor JetBlue holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor JetBlue holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor JetBlue holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor JetBlue holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor JetBlue holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H