Comparison Overview

Hainan Airlines

VS

gategourmet

Hainan Airlines

Comprehensive Office Building No.21,Hainan Airlines Haikou Meilan Base, No.9, Meilan Airport Road, haikou, hainan, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Hainan Airlines holding company was established in 1993 from their main base in Haikou, and continued on to develop seven shipping bases in China with routes covering Asia and radiating into Europe, North America, Oceania and Africa. In all, Hainan Airlines has opened up almost 500 domestic and international flight routes, reaching almost 100 destinations. For over 20 years Hainan Airlines has embraced the concept of “Oriental hospitality” and advocates a “respect for the customer” service spirit. As a world-class aviation enterprise the “cherished experience” brand philosophy isn’t just our business, it’s our calling. Each year, Hainan Airlines provides thousands of passengers with safe, attentive service. We promote tourism, give peace of mind to loved-ones, meet the unique needs of our business travelers, and focus on making your safety and comfort, our priority. Today Hainan Airlines has over 10,000 employees all over the world, each with their own language, experience, and story. HNA cherishes each and every employee's knowledge and wholeheartedly respects each employee’s contribution. Our next milestone at Hainan Airlines is global diversification and the aggressive development of an international perspective. We can offer challenges, passion and possibilities and in return, we need your vision, experience and creativity.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 3,465
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

gategourmet

Glattbrugg, CH
Last Update: 2025-11-27

gategourmet has been serving the airline industry for more than 70 years and has become the world’s largest independent provider of airline catering and logistics. We prepare tens of thousands of tasty, nutritious passenger meals and snacks daily and reliably service more than 2 million flights a year in “last mile” operations worldwide. gategourmet is the core business behind gategroup, the leading independent global provider of products, services and solutions related to an airline passenger’s onboard experience. Our 27,000 employees work to serve people on the move with their expertise in catering and hospitality, provisioning and logistics, and onboard solutions. We serve over 250 carriers in more than 30 countries and provide our customers with expertise and solutions tailored to their guests, service offerings, and geographic regions.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 10,643
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-hainan-airlines.jpeg
Hainan Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gate-gourmet.jpeg
gategourmet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hainan Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
gategourmet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hainan Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for gategourmet in 2025.

Incident History — Hainan Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hainan Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — gategourmet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

gategourmet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-hainan-airlines.jpeg
Hainan Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gate-gourmet.jpeg
gategourmet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hainan Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to gategourmet company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, gategourmet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hainan Airlines company.

In the current year, gategourmet company and Hainan Airlines company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither gategourmet company nor Hainan Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither gategourmet company nor Hainan Airlines company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither gategourmet company nor Hainan Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hainan Airlines company nor gategourmet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor gategourmet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hainan Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to gategourmet company.

gategourmet company employs more people globally than Hainan Airlines company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor gategourmet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor gategourmet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor gategourmet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor gategourmet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor gategourmet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hainan Airlines nor gategourmet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H