Comparison Overview

China Development Research Foundation

VS

Jefferson Institute

China Development Research Foundation

Floor 15, Tower A, Imperial International Center,, Beijing, undefined, 100011, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The China Development Research Foundation is a non-profit institution that seeks to improve social and economic development in China through applied policy research, training, and informed dialogue. Initiated by the Development Research Centre of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, the Foundation works on public policy issues in partnership with leading universities, financial institutions, private enterprises, and government agencies in China and internationally.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jefferson Institute

160 N Carolina Ave SE, Washington, District of Columbia 20003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The Jefferson Institute is an independent research and education institute. We are inspired by Thomas Jefferson’s challenge to pursue truth, wherever it may lead. We inform decision with alternative solutions. We deploy digital tools and integrate them with research and education systems to transform society by empowering engaged access to information. We deliver on-line learning, digital archives, and data journalism. Information is the currency of democracy and we are living in an information renaissance, but the full potential of this era remains constrained for many citizens. The fundamental principles of democracy remain constant from the time of Mr. Jefferson. Our challenge is to bend and bind new information tools to yield the power of these eternal freedoms for all. The Jefferson Institute is a non-partisan, not-for-profit corporation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-development-research-foundation.jpeg
China Development Research Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jefferson-institute.jpeg
Jefferson Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Development Research Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jefferson Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Development Research Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jefferson Institute in 2025.

Incident History — China Development Research Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Development Research Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jefferson Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jefferson Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-development-research-foundation.jpeg
China Development Research Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jefferson-institute.jpeg
Jefferson Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both China Development Research Foundation company and Jefferson Institute company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Jefferson Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China Development Research Foundation company.

In the current year, Jefferson Institute company and China Development Research Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jefferson Institute company nor China Development Research Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jefferson Institute company nor China Development Research Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jefferson Institute company nor China Development Research Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Development Research Foundation company nor Jefferson Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Development Research Foundation nor Jefferson Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither China Development Research Foundation company nor Jefferson Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

China Development Research Foundation company employs more people globally than Jefferson Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither China Development Research Foundation nor Jefferson Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Development Research Foundation nor Jefferson Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Development Research Foundation nor Jefferson Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Development Research Foundation nor Jefferson Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Development Research Foundation nor Jefferson Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Development Research Foundation nor Jefferson Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X