Comparison Overview

China Construction Bank New York Branch

VS

RBC

China Construction Bank New York Branch

1095 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, 10036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

China Construction Bank Corporation New York Branch (CCBNY) received a full branch license from the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank in February 2009 and opened for business in July of 2009.The opening of the NY branch marked the establishment of CCB’s first branch in the Americas.The NY branch specializes in comprehensive wholesale banking business including Corporate Banking,Trade Finance, Treasury products, Time & Demand Deposits and USD clearing. CCBNY provides extensive financial products and services to our customers and strives to achieve significant business development,especially by increasing its local market share of RMB trade settlement. Based on the advantageous location of New York, the dominant financial markets in the world, and CCB’s strong customer base in China, CCBNY offers various supports and products for our customers to expand business both into China and the US, playing a significant role in facilitating bilateral economic and trading activities.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RBC

200 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5J 2J5
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

Royal Bank of Canada is a global financial institution with a purpose-driven, principles-led approach to delivering leading performance. Our success comes from the 94,000+ employees who leverage their imaginations and insights to bring our vision, values and strategy to life so we can help our clients thrive and communities prosper. As Canada's biggest bank and one of the largest in the world, based on market capitalization, we have a diversified business model with a focus on innovation and providing exceptional experiences to our more than 17 million clients in Canada, the U.S. and 27 other countries. Learn more at rbc.com. We are proud to support a broad range of community initiatives through donations, community investments and employee volunteer activities. See how at www.rbc.com/community-social-impact. http://rbc.com/legalstuff. La Banque Royale du Canada est une institution financière mondiale définie par sa raison d'être, guidée par des principes et orientée vers l'excellence en matière de rendement. Notre succès est attribuable aux quelque 94 000+ employés qui mettent à profit leur créativité et leur savoir faire pour concrétiser notre vision, nos valeurs et notre stratégie afin que nous puissions contribuer à la prospérité de nos clients et au dynamisme des collectivités. Selon la capitalisation boursière, nous sommes la plus importante banque du Canada et l'une des plus grandes banques du monde. Nous avons adopté un modèle d'affaires diversifié axé sur l'innovation et l'offre d'expériences exceptionnelles à nos plus de 17 millions de clients au Canada, aux États Unis et dans 27 autres pays. Pour en savoir plus, visitez le site rbc.com/francais Nous sommes fiers d'appuyer une grande diversité d'initiatives communautaires par des dons, des investissements dans la collectivité et le travail bénévole de nos employés. Pour de plus amples renseignements, visitez le site www.rbc.com/collectivite-impact-social. https://www.rbc.com/conditions-dutilisation/

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 96,639
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-construction-bank-new-york-branch.jpeg
China Construction Bank New York Branch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbc.jpeg
RBC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Construction Bank New York Branch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RBC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Construction Bank New York Branch in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

RBC has 12.36% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — China Construction Bank New York Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Construction Bank New York Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-construction-bank-new-york-branch.jpeg
China Construction Bank New York Branch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbc.jpeg
RBC
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Legitimate Credential Abuse, Social Engineering (Recruitment via Telegram), Insider Access Misuse
Motivation: Financial Fraud, Data Theft for Resale, Potential Espionage (National Security Risk)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

China Construction Bank New York Branch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RBC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

RBC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas China Construction Bank New York Branch company has not reported any.

In the current year, RBC company has reported more cyber incidents than China Construction Bank New York Branch company.

Neither RBC company nor China Construction Bank New York Branch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

RBC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while China Construction Bank New York Branch company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither RBC company nor China Construction Bank New York Branch company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Construction Bank New York Branch company nor RBC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Construction Bank New York Branch nor RBC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RBC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to China Construction Bank New York Branch company.

RBC company employs more people globally than China Construction Bank New York Branch company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither China Construction Bank New York Branch nor RBC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Construction Bank New York Branch nor RBC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Construction Bank New York Branch nor RBC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Construction Bank New York Branch nor RBC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Construction Bank New York Branch nor RBC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Construction Bank New York Branch nor RBC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H