Comparison Overview

Chileda

VS

Fullscript

Chileda

undefined, undefined, undefined, 54601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Chileda is a nationally recognized education and comprehensive residential treatment center located in La Crosse, WI. Chileda's campus includes four duplexes along with an education building containing our school and indoor recreational areas. We serve individuals, ages 6-21, from across the United States. Youth who enter our program may be diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, traumatic brain injury, attention-deficit hyper-activity disorder and other cognitive and behavioral challenges. Chileda’s services also extend to our In-Home Support Services that aim to serve individuals in our surrounding and local communities who live in their own home. Chileda has also opened an Adult Family Group Home in La Crosse County. This group home will improve the lives of former Chileda residents and students as they continue to age. Our highly trained and compassionate staff are leaders in their field who customize an individualized approach for each student to help them replace challenging behaviors so they can return to their least restrictive environment.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 172
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fullscript

245 Cooper St, Ottawa, Ontario, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Fullscript believes in the power of whole person care and is fully committed to helping all providers deliver it. We help create an ongoing cycle of whole person care by giving providers a single platform that brings together industry-leading labs, clinically effective supplements, and an intuitive suite of tools to promote adherence and outcomes. www.fullscript.com

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 603
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chileda.jpeg
Chileda
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fullscript.jpeg
Fullscript
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chileda
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fullscript
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chileda in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fullscript in 2025.

Incident History — Chileda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chileda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fullscript (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fullscript cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chileda.jpeg
Chileda
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fullscript.jpeg
Fullscript
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fullscript company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chileda company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fullscript company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chileda company.

In the current year, Fullscript company and Chileda company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fullscript company nor Chileda company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fullscript company nor Chileda company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fullscript company nor Chileda company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chileda company nor Fullscript company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chileda nor Fullscript holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chileda company nor Fullscript company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fullscript company employs more people globally than Chileda company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Chileda nor Fullscript holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chileda nor Fullscript holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chileda nor Fullscript holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chileda nor Fullscript holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chileda nor Fullscript holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chileda nor Fullscript holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H