Comparison Overview

Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent

VS

Billet Health

Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent

355 Lark Street, Chatham, Ontario N7L 5B2, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

The Children’s Treatment Centre of Chatham-Kent (CTC) focuses on the needs of children and youth from birth through to 21 years of age with physical, developmental or communication needs. Audiology services are also available for individuals of all ages. The Children’s Treatment Centre aims to open a world of opportunity for children in the Chatham-Kent area through our numerous services uniquely shaped for each child. CTC has served the community for over 70 years as a non-profit treatment centre with an elected board of directors. With professional staff and volunteers, CTC is committed to providing support and serving needs both in the centre and in our community. Our mission is to provide specialized therapy and innovative programs to empower children, youth and their families to reach their individual potential. We are caring people celebrating abilities and making a greater difference with our community. Our values include: Integrity Collaboration Inclusion Safety

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Billet Health

6710 N 47th Ave, Glendale, Arizona, US, 85301
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Billet Health is a veteran-owned, nonprofit healthcare organization delivering coordinated care across every stage of life. We offer a full continuum of services - including home health, hospice, pharmacy, primary care, caregiving, chronic care, podiatry, dermatology, and more - all under one connected network. With 27 locations across 5 states, our mission is to make care feel seamless, personal, and truly supportive for patients and families navigating complex health needs. Born from service, Billet was founded by two veterans who saw the gaps in our healthcare system - and set out to build something better: ➡️ Care that meets people where they are ➡️ Services that work together, not in silos ➡️ A team that treats every patient like family We partner closely with hospitals, discharge planners, and community health providers to ensure patients receive timely, high-quality care in the comfort of home - and that families never feel lost in the system. If you believe healthcare should be more human — you belong in the Billet network.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-treatment-centre-of-chatham-kent.jpeg
Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/billet-health.jpeg
Billet Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Billet Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Billet Health in 2025.

Incident History — Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Billet Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Billet Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-treatment-centre-of-chatham-kent.jpeg
Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/billet-health.jpeg
Billet Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Billet Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Billet Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company.

In the current year, Billet Health company and Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Billet Health company nor Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Billet Health company nor Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Billet Health company nor Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company nor Billet Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent nor Billet Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company nor Billet Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Billet Health company employs more people globally than Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent nor Billet Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent nor Billet Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent nor Billet Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent nor Billet Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent nor Billet Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Children's Treatment Centre and Foundation of Chatham-Kent nor Billet Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H