Comparison Overview

Children's Museum of South Dakota

VS

Historic Germanna

Children's Museum of South Dakota

521 4th Street, Brookings, South Dakota, 57006, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://prairieplay.org

The Children's Museum of South Dakota seeks to transform the world by inspiring generations to love learning and believe that life is full of possibilities. We spark imagination for all children and their grown-ups through play, creativity, and discovery. With more than 44,000 square feet of indoor play space on 4 acres of prairie, we tell the story of our connection between land and culture in the Midwest region. Guests are encouraged to use their imagination and explore using more than 5,000 lose parts and props, but we may be most famous for housing the country's largest animatronic dinosaur, Mama T. Rex.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Historic Germanna

P.O. Box 279, Locust Grove, Virginia, 22508, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.germanna.org/

Historic Germanna, formerly known as the Germanna Foundation, is a non-profit organization dedicated to preserving and sharing Virginia's rich historical heritage. Through its historic, natural, and cultural resources, Historic Germanna offers diverse audiences experiential, educational, and wellness opportunities. Sites include the Fort Germanna Visitor Center & Hitt Archaeology Center, Siegen Forest Trail System, Fort Germanna Archaeology Site, "Enchanted Castle" Archaeology Site, Salubria Manor, Peter Hitt Farm, and more. Historic Germanna is committed to ensuring accessibility and promoting a deeper understanding of shared history among multiple communities. Learn more at Germanna.org. Historic Germanna is a 501-c-3 nonprofit organization Donations are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law. The Foundation’s non-profit tax ID number is 54-6048585.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-south-dakota.jpeg
Children's Museum of South Dakota
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/germanna-foundation.jpeg
Historic Germanna
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Children's Museum of South Dakota
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic Germanna
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Museum of South Dakota in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Germanna in 2026.

Incident History — Children's Museum of South Dakota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Museum of South Dakota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic Germanna (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Germanna cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-south-dakota.jpeg
Children's Museum of South Dakota
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/germanna-foundation.jpeg
Historic Germanna
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic Germanna company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Children's Museum of South Dakota company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historic Germanna company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Children's Museum of South Dakota company.

In the current year, Historic Germanna company and Children's Museum of South Dakota company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic Germanna company nor Children's Museum of South Dakota company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic Germanna company nor Children's Museum of South Dakota company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic Germanna company nor Children's Museum of South Dakota company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota company nor Historic Germanna company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Historic Germanna holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota company nor Historic Germanna company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Children's Museum of South Dakota company employs more people globally than Historic Germanna company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Historic Germanna holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Historic Germanna holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Historic Germanna holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Historic Germanna holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Historic Germanna holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Historic Germanna holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References