Comparison Overview

Children's Museum of Pittsburgh

VS

Natural History Museum

Children's Museum of Pittsburgh

10 Children's Way, Pittsburgh, PA, 15212, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Children’s Museum of Pittsburgh is a place that delights and inspires children, where they can take off on fantastic flights of imagination daily, and return to earth to build a circuit, throw a clay pot and turn an eight-foot waterwheel. Named one of the Top 10 Best Museums for Families by USA Today reader poll in 2017, the Museum welcomes more than 302,000 visitors annually and provides tons of fun and loads of “real stuff” experiences for play and learning. Hands-on, interactive exhibit areas and experiences that inspire joy, creativity and curiosity include The Studio, Theater, Waterplay, Nursery, Backyard and a changing exhibits gallery. Explore MAKESHOP, a dedicated space where kids and adults can build and tinker with old and new technologies, exciting projects and cutting-edge media including stop motion animation, woodworking, sewing, weaving, electronics and more. The Museum’s award-winning, three-story building connects two historic buildings, Allegheny Post Office Building & the Buhl Building. Its center building is screened by a shimmering wind sculpture created by environmental artist Ned Kahn (Articulated Cloud). The Museum is a certified green building (Silver LEED) and was honored by the American Institute for Architects and the National Historic Preservation Trust.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Natural History Museum

Cromwell Road, London, England, SW7 5BD, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

The Natural History Museum is a world-class visitor attraction and leading science research centre. We use the Museum's unique collections and our unrivalled expertise to tackle the biggest challenges facing the world today. More than 80 million objects spanning billions of years are in our care. We welcome more than five million visitors to our galleries annually, and 16 million visitors to our websites. Today the Museum is more relevant and influential than ever. By attracting people from a range of backgrounds to work for us, we can continue to look at the world with fresh eyes. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jobs  Stay up to date with Museum news and events on our website: https://www.nhm.ac.uk/ And on social media: https://facebook.com/naturalhistorymuseum  https://twitter.com/NHM_London https://instagram/natural_history_museum  https://www.tiktok.com/@its_nhm https://youtube.com/naturalhistorymuseum

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,656
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-pittsburgh.jpeg
Children's Museum of Pittsburgh
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natural-history-museum.jpeg
Natural History Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Children's Museum of Pittsburgh
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natural History Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Museum of Pittsburgh in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natural History Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Children's Museum of Pittsburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Museum of Pittsburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natural History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natural History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-pittsburgh.jpeg
Children's Museum of Pittsburgh
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natural-history-museum.jpeg
Natural History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natural History Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Natural History Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company.

In the current year, Natural History Museum company and Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natural History Museum company nor Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum company nor Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum company nor Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company nor Natural History Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of Pittsburgh nor Natural History Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Natural History Museum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company.

Natural History Museum company employs more people globally than Children's Museum of Pittsburgh company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Children's Museum of Pittsburgh nor Natural History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of Pittsburgh nor Natural History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of Pittsburgh nor Natural History Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of Pittsburgh nor Natural History Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Children's Museum of Pittsburgh nor Natural History Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Children's Museum of Pittsburgh nor Natural History Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N