Comparison Overview

Children's Health Council

VS

Invivo Clinics BV

Children's Health Council

650 Clark Way, None, Palo Alto, CA, US, 94304
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Children’s Health Council (CHC) is a nonprofit agency that has been providing best-in-class learning and mental health services to families in our community for over 70 years. We envision a world where everyone can reach their promise and potential. Our mission is to transform young lives by providing culturally-responsive best-in-class learning and mental health services to families from diverse backgrounds regardless of language, location or ability to pay. We offer programs for ADHD, Learning Differences & Executive Functioning, Anxiety, Depression & Suicidality and Autism through our schools, education programs, clinical services, robust community education programs and curated online resources. Our goal is to raise awareness, build partnerships, reduce stigma and ensure that no one ever feels alone.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 229
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Invivo Clinics BV

Populierenlaan 595-597, Amstelveen, 1185 SX, NL
Last Update:

Invivo Clinics is een instelling die zowel BGGZ en SGGZ biedt. Daarbij maakt Invivo Clinics vooral gebruik van het programma Freedom of Movement™, gebaseerd op de acceptance en commitment therapie (ACT) De behandelvisie is enigszins vergelijkbaar met het motto dat veel mensen aanspreekt: “Accept with serenity what you cannot change, have the courage to change what you can, and develop the wisdom to know the difference.” De meeste mensen vinden het makkelijker om het met het motto eens te zijn dan te doen wat ermee gezegd wordt. De reden is dat veel mensen niet weten wat ze wel of niet kunnen veranderen. Het resultaat is dat ze niet weten hoe het motto in het dagelijks leven te implementeren en hierdoor gefrustreerd raken. Het Freedom of Movement programma helpt je om het motto om te zetten in daden. De missie van Invivo Clinics is het versterken van psychisch welbevinden en het ontwikkelen van toekomstperspectief, waarbij we mensen (en organisaties) bewust willen maken van hun waarden en mogelijkheden. Daarmee worden blokkades doorbroken en bieden wij mensen met de ruimte en nieuwe inzichten die ontstaan, een gezonde(re) kijk op leven én werken. Naast het Freedom of Movement programma bieden wij schematherapie, traumabehandeling (EMDR), cognitieve gedragstherapie, systeembegeleiding, medicamenteuze behandeling en mindfulness. Hoe werkt Invivo Clinics? - Persoonlijke aanpak met aandacht voor de wensen van de client. - Keuze uit verschillende behandelvormen. - Vergoeding door alle zorgverzekeraars.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-health-council.jpeg
Children's Health Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/invivo-clinics-bv.jpeg
Invivo Clinics BV
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Children's Health Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Invivo Clinics BV
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Health Council in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Invivo Clinics BV in 2026.

Incident History — Children's Health Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Health Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Invivo Clinics BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Invivo Clinics BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-health-council.jpeg
Children's Health Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/invivo-clinics-bv.jpeg
Invivo Clinics BV
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Children's Health Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Invivo Clinics BV company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Invivo Clinics BV company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Children's Health Council company.

In the current year, Invivo Clinics BV company and Children's Health Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Invivo Clinics BV company nor Children's Health Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Invivo Clinics BV company nor Children's Health Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Invivo Clinics BV company nor Children's Health Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Children's Health Council company nor Invivo Clinics BV company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Children's Health Council nor Invivo Clinics BV holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Children's Health Council company nor Invivo Clinics BV company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Children's Health Council company employs more people globally than Invivo Clinics BV company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Children's Health Council nor Invivo Clinics BV holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Children's Health Council nor Invivo Clinics BV holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Children's Health Council nor Invivo Clinics BV holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Children's Health Council nor Invivo Clinics BV holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Children's Health Council nor Invivo Clinics BV holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Children's Health Council nor Invivo Clinics BV holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N