Comparison Overview

Children's Museum of South Dakota

VS

Oslo Museum

Children's Museum of South Dakota

521 4th Street, Brookings, South Dakota, 57006, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://prairieplay.org

The Children's Museum of South Dakota seeks to transform the world by inspiring generations to love learning and believe that life is full of possibilities. We spark imagination for all children and their grown-ups through play, creativity, and discovery. With more than 44,000 square feet of indoor play space on 4 acres of prairie, we tell the story of our connection between land and culture in the Midwest region. Guests are encouraged to use their imagination and explore using more than 5,000 lose parts and props, but we may be most famous for housing the country's largest animatronic dinosaur, Mama T. Rex.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Oslo Museum

Frognerveien 67, Oslo, 0257, NO
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://oslomuseum.no

Stiftelsen Oslo Museum er byens eget museum, og bidrar til kunnskap om og forankring i Oslo-samfunnet. Museet forvalter, formidler og forsker i Oslos historie, teaterhistorie og nyere innvandringshistorie. Museet har en aktiv formidlingsprofil og tilhold på flere steder i Oslo; Bymuseet og Teatermuseet i Frognerparken, Interkulturelt Museum på Grønland og Arbeidermuseet på Sagene. Oslo Museum ble i 2019 kåret til «Årets museum» av Norges Museumsforbund, med begrunnelse i museets mangfoldsprofil og nyskapende formidlings- og utstillingsarbeid. Museet forvalter en av landets største fotosamlinger, har en stor samling av malerier og Oslo-portretter, og en kulturhistorisk samling som også inkluderer intervjumateriale.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-south-dakota.jpeg
Children's Museum of South Dakota
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Children's Museum of South Dakota
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oslo Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Museum of South Dakota in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oslo Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Children's Museum of South Dakota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Museum of South Dakota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oslo Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oslo Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-south-dakota.jpeg
Children's Museum of South Dakota
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oslo-museum.jpeg
Oslo Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Oslo Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Children's Museum of South Dakota company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oslo Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Children's Museum of South Dakota company.

In the current year, Oslo Museum company and Children's Museum of South Dakota company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Children's Museum of South Dakota company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Children's Museum of South Dakota company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oslo Museum company nor Children's Museum of South Dakota company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota company nor Oslo Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Oslo Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota company nor Oslo Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Oslo Museum company employs more people globally than Children's Museum of South Dakota company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Oslo Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Oslo Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Oslo Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Oslo Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Oslo Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Children's Museum of South Dakota nor Oslo Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References