Comparison Overview

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

VS

Civic Consulting

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission is a new organisation established by the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008, following an in-depth review of child maintenance policy and delivery arrangements in this country. The Commission is responsible for the child maintenance system in Great Britain. The Commission’s key objective is to maximise the number of effective child maintenance arrangements that are in place, whether private or statutory. To achieve this aim, the Commission provides an information and support service (Child Maintenance Options) and oversees the statutory maintenance service currently run by the Child Support Agency. Over time, the Commission will improve arrangements for the assessment, collection and enforcement of child maintenance for parents using that service. The Commission is a crown Non-Departmental Public Body, which means it operates at arms length from Government, enabling it to innovate and provide services how and through the mechanisms it chooses. With this new structure, we have an opportunity to deliver a new system of child maintenance in Great Britain that really works for separated families.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Civic Consulting

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Civic Consulting is an economic and public policy consultancy founded in 2002 to provide high quality research, analysis and practical, evidence-based policy advice in the areas of consumer policy, financial services, food chain issues, animal health and welfare, public risk management, and good governance. Our clients include the European Commission, the European Parliament, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the German Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), and other national public and non-profit institutions. Our approach to research is distinctive in several respects. We think that wide-ranging subjects demand interdisciplinary approaches. Our team has a multidisciplinary background including economics, law, political science, food and veterinary sciences, and other relevant disciplines. Our academic associates come from universities and research centres at the forefront of their fields of research; our network of specialists in the EU and across the globe provides support in regions where field research is carried out. The strength of our research lies in the use of advanced methodologies and professional expertise, combined with a strong commitment to comprehensive data collection, impartial analysis, and clear presentation of results. We conduct multi-country surveys, in-depth interviews of stakeholders, case studies, and other primary research; we evaluate academic literature, review economic data series, prepare legal analyses, and employ expert panels; we apply economic theory to specific problems and use quantitative statistical and econometric methods while also valuing rigorous qualitative analysis.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/civic-consulting.jpeg
Civic Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Civic Consulting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Civic Consulting in 2025.

Incident History — Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Civic Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Civic Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/civic-consulting.jpeg
Civic Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Civic Consulting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Civic Consulting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company.

In the current year, Civic Consulting company and Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Civic Consulting company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Civic Consulting company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Civic Consulting company nor Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor Civic Consulting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission nor Civic Consulting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company nor Civic Consulting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission company employs more people globally than Civic Consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission nor Civic Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission nor Civic Consulting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission nor Civic Consulting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission nor Civic Consulting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission nor Civic Consulting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission nor Civic Consulting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H