Comparison Overview

Chico's FAS, Inc.

VS

Next

Chico's FAS, Inc.

11215 Metro Parkway, Fort Myers, FL, US, 33966
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.chicos.com/store/category/new+arrivals/cat40036/

Our passion for fashion and desire to inspire confidence and joy have been guiding the creation of our women’s clothing, intimates, and accessories for more than 40 years. Our portfolio consists of three brands: Chico’s, WHBM, and Soma found in over 1,000 stores throughout the United States and online. Our commitment and dedication come from our loyal customers and devoted Associates, who are equally inspired by our values. If you share our passion for fashion, we invite you to join us. Visit: https://jobs.chicos.com/

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,325
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Next

Enderby, Leicester, Leicestershire, GB, LE19 4AT
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849
https://careers.next.co.uk/

At Next we never underestimate what we can do. Bring your energy, play to your strengths and never shy away from change. Push yourself and back others. Make things happen that will be bigger and better than before. Come and work for one of the UK’s biggest retailers. It is everything you could imagine, and so much more. We’re constantly innovating, constantly working on something new and constantly creating more and more exciting new products, which means no day is the same, and no day is dull. Whether you take up a role in making furniture with our lively warehouse team or join our team of superhuman developers and tech engineers, you’ll be rubbing shoulders with some of the most talented people in the country, who not only work hard but play hard too. Let's take it on.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 25,062
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chico-s-fas-inc.jpeg
Chico's FAS, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chico's FAS, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Next
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chico's FAS, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Next in 2026.

Incident History — Chico's FAS, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chico's FAS, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Next (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Next cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chico-s-fas-inc.jpeg
Chico's FAS, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party contractor
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifeatnext.jpeg
Next
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Next company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chico's FAS, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Chico's FAS, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Next company has not reported any.

In the current year, Next company and Chico's FAS, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Next company nor Chico's FAS, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Chico's FAS, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Next company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Next company nor Chico's FAS, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chico's FAS, Inc. company nor Next company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chico's FAS, Inc. nor Next holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Next company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Chico's FAS, Inc. company.

Next company employs more people globally than Chico's FAS, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Chico's FAS, Inc. nor Next holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chico's FAS, Inc. nor Next holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chico's FAS, Inc. nor Next holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chico's FAS, Inc. nor Next holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chico's FAS, Inc. nor Next holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chico's FAS, Inc. nor Next holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References