Comparison Overview

Chicken Shack

VS

Jimmy John's

Chicken Shack

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-05-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Founded in 1956, Chicken Shack is the place to go to get the best Chicken, Ribs and Seafood in the Metro Detroit area. Stop in and try our delicious food, and remember, "When you think Chicken, think Chicken Shack."

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 209
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jimmy John's

3 Glenlake Pkwy NE, None, Sandy Springs, Georgia, US, 30328
Last Update: 2025-07-25 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

THE SANDWICH OF SANDWICHESโ„  At Jimmy John's, we don't make sandwiches. We make The Sandwich of Sandwichesโ„ . We use fresh vegetables because we don't hate salads, we just feel bad for them. We hand-slice our provolone cheese and meats in-house every day, because packaged pre-sliced meats doesn't have the same ring to it. And we bake bread all day, every day because stale bread isn't bread, it's... croutons. The flavors of fresh-veggies, combined with hand-sliced meats and fresh-baked bread is what makes a Jimmy John's sandwich The Sandwich of Sandwichesโ„ . For more information, visit jimmyjohns.com and InspireBrands.com. For careers, visit our careers site: careers.jimmyjohns.com Connect with us on social media: instagram.com/jimmyjohns facebook.com/jimmyjohns twitter.com/jimmyjohns tiktok.com/@jimmyjohns pinterest.com/jimmyjohns www.youtube.com/user/jimmyjohns www.InspireBrands.com This profile is for Jimmy John's Headquarters. Each Jimmy John's is independently owned and operated under a franchise agreement with Jimmy John's Franchise, LLC, franchisor of the JIMMY JOHN'S system. Any questions regarding employment must be directed to the franchise owner/operator. Jimmy Johnโ€™s Franchise, LLC does not have access to franchiseesโ€™ employment records or specific rules for employment as defined by the franchisees.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 18,724
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicken-shack.jpeg
Chicken Shack
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jimmy-john's.jpeg
Jimmy John's
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Chicken Shack
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jimmy John's
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicken Shack in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jimmy John's in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Chicken Shack (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicken Shack cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Jimmy John's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jimmy John's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicken-shack.jpeg
Chicken Shack
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jimmy-john's.jpeg
Jimmy John's
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Chicken Shack company and Jimmy John's company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Jimmy John's company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Chicken Shack company has not reported any.

In the current year, Jimmy John's company and Chicken Shack company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jimmy John's company nor Chicken Shack company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jimmy John's company nor Chicken Shack company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Jimmy John's company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Chicken Shack company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Chicken Shack company nor Jimmy John's company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chicken Shack company nor Jimmy John's company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jimmy John's company employs more people globally than Chicken Shack company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X