Comparison Overview

Chicago Tech, Inc.

VS

Overland-Tandberg

Chicago Tech, Inc.

3501 Woodhead Dr., Northbrook, IL, 60062, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

To companies that depend on Technology to empower their business, Chicago Tech is the partner who delivers IT and Telecom Asset Management, freeing you from the complexity of managing technology. Not only do we specialize in high tech equipment, we provide IT and Telecom Asset Management that includes - Procurement Strategies, Remarketing Solutions, Professional and Financial Services. We've built a reputation on Vendor Independence, Flexibility and Experience. We're a leader in helping organizations reduce cost and improve efficiency through aggressive IT and Telecom Asset Management. Please contact us for more information. Phone: 847-504-0544 Email: [email protected] Website: www.chicagotech.com Blog: http://www.chicagotechinc.com Follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/chicagotechinc

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Overland-Tandberg

6111 Bollinger Canyon Rd, San Ramon, California, 94583, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

About Overland-Tandberg(TM) Founded in 1979 Overland-Tandberg provides “best in class” data storage and archive solutions that are reliable and mindfully built for the Enterprise and SMB. With 44 years of service in over 90 countries, our brands have created a rich and trusted heritage, built on game changing patented technologies that are enhanced through our people and partners. We combine a delicate blend of science and art in our solutions to ensure we align our aspirational goals of inclusiveness yet taking a humanistic approach to our core beliefs. Empowering our people is essential to unlocking the virtues of progressiveness and keep us in front of the competitive landscape ready for the next 40 years and beyond. The New Overland-Tandberg… Strong in heritage… rich future!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 159
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-tech-inc-.jpeg
Chicago Tech, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/overlandtandberg.jpeg
Overland-Tandberg
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chicago Tech, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Overland-Tandberg
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Tech, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Overland-Tandberg in 2025.

Incident History — Chicago Tech, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Tech, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Overland-Tandberg (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Overland-Tandberg cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-tech-inc-.jpeg
Chicago Tech, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/overlandtandberg.jpeg
Overland-Tandberg
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Overland-Tandberg company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Tech, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Overland-Tandberg company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chicago Tech, Inc. company.

In the current year, Overland-Tandberg company and Chicago Tech, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Overland-Tandberg company nor Chicago Tech, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Overland-Tandberg company nor Chicago Tech, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Overland-Tandberg company nor Chicago Tech, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. company nor Overland-Tandberg company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. nor Overland-Tandberg holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. company nor Overland-Tandberg company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Overland-Tandberg company employs more people globally than Chicago Tech, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. nor Overland-Tandberg holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. nor Overland-Tandberg holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. nor Overland-Tandberg holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. nor Overland-Tandberg holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. nor Overland-Tandberg holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chicago Tech, Inc. nor Overland-Tandberg holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H