Comparison Overview

Chicago Tag & Label

VS

Mutual Engraving and Printing Company

Chicago Tag & Label

2501 Commerce Dr, Libertyville, Illinois, 60048, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ChicagoTag.com

We offer the industry’s most Innovative Print Solutions when it comes to form labels, labels and tags to fit your needs It’s our business to understand, identify and analyze your current product, process, and communicate the best design options to meet your conditions. Chicago Tag and Label manufacturers a diverse range of customized form labels, labels, and tags, focusing on value, service and high quality products made in the US. Our nationwide customers come to Chicago Tag & Label seeking high quality products, competitive pricing and exceptional service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mutual Engraving and Printing Company

511 Hempstead Ave, West Hempstead, 11552, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mutualengraving.com

Mutual Engraving is a full service print shop. We do genuine steel die engraving, embossing, thermography, offset printing, foil stamping and digital printing. we specialize in stationery, business cards, invitations and folders, but anything printed is within our realm. All work is done in house and customer service is our claim to fame. we offer a customized online ordering site.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-tag-&-label.jpeg
Chicago Tag & Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Mutual Engraving and Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chicago Tag & Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mutual Engraving and Printing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Tag & Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mutual Engraving and Printing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Chicago Tag & Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Tag & Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mutual Engraving and Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mutual Engraving and Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-tag-&-label.jpeg
Chicago Tag & Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Mutual Engraving and Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Tag & Label company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chicago Tag & Label company.

In the current year, Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company and Chicago Tag & Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company nor Chicago Tag & Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company nor Chicago Tag & Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company nor Chicago Tag & Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label company nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label company nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chicago Tag & Label company employs more people globally than Mutual Engraving and Printing Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chicago Tag & Label nor Mutual Engraving and Printing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References