Comparison Overview

Chicago Humanities

VS

Maryland Center for History & Culture

Chicago Humanities

500 N Dearborn St, Ste 825, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60654
Last Update: 2025-12-02

For 30 years, Chicago Humanities has been giving Chicagoans from all neighborhoods, means, and abilities, access to the day’s most thoughtful writers, scientists, artists, musicians, policymakers, public intellectuals, influencers, and activists. Chicago Humanities produces more than 150 public events annually, from Evanston to Englewood, Wicker Park to South Shore. Its CHF’s belief that by bringing people together in engaging spaces across the city, Chicagoans from all walks of life have the opportunity to enjoy a deeper appreciation for what makes our city unique, the complexities of the wider world, and the root causes of and solutions to issues affecting their lives.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Maryland Center for History & Culture

610 Park Avenue, Baltimore, 21201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Maryland Center for History and Culture (MCHC), originally founded as the Maryland Historical Society in 1844, is the state’s oldest continuously operating cultural institution. In keeping with the founders’ commitment to preserve the remnants of Maryland’s past, the MCHC remains the premier institution for state history. With over 350,000 objects and seven million books and documents, this institution now serves upward of 100,000 people through its museum, library, press, and educational programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-humanities.jpeg
Chicago Humanities
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maryland-historical-society.jpeg
Maryland Center for History & Culture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chicago Humanities
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Maryland Center for History & Culture
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Humanities in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maryland Center for History & Culture in 2025.

Incident History — Chicago Humanities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Humanities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Maryland Center for History & Culture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maryland Center for History & Culture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-humanities.jpeg
Chicago Humanities
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maryland-historical-society.jpeg
Maryland Center for History & Culture
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Chicago Humanities company and Maryland Center for History & Culture company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Maryland Center for History & Culture company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chicago Humanities company.

In the current year, Maryland Center for History & Culture company and Chicago Humanities company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Maryland Center for History & Culture company nor Chicago Humanities company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Maryland Center for History & Culture company nor Chicago Humanities company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Maryland Center for History & Culture company nor Chicago Humanities company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chicago Humanities company nor Maryland Center for History & Culture company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chicago Humanities nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chicago Humanities company nor Maryland Center for History & Culture company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Maryland Center for History & Culture company employs more people globally than Chicago Humanities company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Chicago Humanities nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chicago Humanities nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chicago Humanities nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chicago Humanities nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chicago Humanities nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chicago Humanities nor Maryland Center for History & Culture holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X