Comparison Overview

Chicago Booth Review

VS

Rowland Reading Foundation

Chicago Booth Review

5807 S. Woodlawn Ave., Chicago, IL, US, 60637
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Chicago Booth Review publishes research-driven insights on business, policy, and markets. We are a publication of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. The magazine traces its origins back to the 1960s, when Chicago Booth—or the Graduate School of Business, as it was then known—began publishing Selected Papers, written by faculty members for a general audience. In 1997, the school launched Capital Ideas as a separate newsletter that featured articles about faculty research. It subsequently evolved into a magazine of the same name. In 2016, we rebranded as Chicago Booth Review. Chicago Booth’s insistence on robust data, careful analysis, and rigorous models has characterized the Chicago Approach, and it’s our guiding value. Chicago has a long and proud tradition of debate and discussion. We welcome your comments and contributions. Listen: www.chicagobooth.edu/review/podcast

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rowland Reading Foundation

6120 University Ave., Middleton, 53562, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Rowland Reading Foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving reading instruction in the primary grades. The Foundation publishes Superkids, a phonics-based core reading program just for kindergarten through second grade that integrates all the language arts. Superkids combines rigorous instruction with highly motivating materials and has achieved exceptional results in schools throughout the United States. The Foundation also provides teachers the training they need to implement the program most effectively—and gives students the strong instruction they deserve.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-booth-review.jpeg
Chicago Booth Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rowland-reading-foundation.jpeg
Rowland Reading Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chicago Booth Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rowland Reading Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Booth Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rowland Reading Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Chicago Booth Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Booth Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rowland Reading Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rowland Reading Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-booth-review.jpeg
Chicago Booth Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rowland-reading-foundation.jpeg
Rowland Reading Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rowland Reading Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Booth Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rowland Reading Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chicago Booth Review company.

In the current year, Rowland Reading Foundation company and Chicago Booth Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rowland Reading Foundation company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Rowland Reading Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Rowland Reading Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Rowland Reading Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rowland Reading Foundation company employs more people globally than Chicago Booth Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Rowland Reading Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Rowland Reading Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Rowland Reading Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Rowland Reading Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Rowland Reading Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Rowland Reading Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.