Comparison Overview

Chicago Booth Review

VS

Relix Media Group

Chicago Booth Review

5807 S. Woodlawn Ave., Chicago, IL, US, 60637
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Chicago Booth Review publishes research-driven insights on business, policy, and markets. We are a publication of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. The magazine traces its origins back to the 1960s, when Chicago Booth—or the Graduate School of Business, as it was then known—began publishing Selected Papers, written by faculty members for a general audience. In 1997, the school launched Capital Ideas as a separate newsletter that featured articles about faculty research. It subsequently evolved into a magazine of the same name. In 2016, we rebranded as Chicago Booth Review. Chicago Booth’s insistence on robust data, careful analysis, and rigorous models has characterized the Chicago Approach, and it’s our guiding value. Chicago has a long and proud tradition of debate and discussion. We welcome your comments and contributions. Listen: www.chicagobooth.edu/review/podcast

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Relix Media Group

104 West 29th St., New York, NY, 10001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Relix is a music magazine focusing on live music with a focus on band interviews, album reviews, concert festivals, music videos, podcasts, musician interviews, musician classifieds, and show reviews. Relix Magazine was launched in 1974 as a handmade newsletter devoted to connecting people who recorded Grateful Dead concerts. It rapidly expanded into a music magazine covering a wide range of artists and the live music scene. It is the second-longest continuously published music magazine in the United States. Relix has a circulation of 102,000 and is published 8 times a year.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-booth-review.jpeg
Chicago Booth Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/relix-magazine.jpeg
Relix Media Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chicago Booth Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Relix Media Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Booth Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Relix Media Group in 2025.

Incident History — Chicago Booth Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Booth Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Relix Media Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Relix Media Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-booth-review.jpeg
Chicago Booth Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/relix-magazine.jpeg
Relix Media Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Relix Media Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Booth Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Relix Media Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chicago Booth Review company.

In the current year, Relix Media Group company and Chicago Booth Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Relix Media Group company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Relix Media Group company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Relix Media Group company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Relix Media Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Relix Media Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Relix Media Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Relix Media Group company employs more people globally than Chicago Booth Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Relix Media Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Relix Media Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Relix Media Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Relix Media Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Relix Media Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Relix Media Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.