Comparison Overview

Chicago Booth Review

VS

Foreign Investment Watch

Chicago Booth Review

5807 S. Woodlawn Ave., Chicago, IL, US, 60637
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.chicagobooth.edu/review

Chicago Booth Review publishes research-driven insights on business, policy, and markets. We are a publication of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. The magazine traces its origins back to the 1960s, when Chicago Booth—or the Graduate School of Business, as it was then known—began publishing Selected Papers, written by faculty members for a general audience. In 1997, the school launched Capital Ideas as a separate newsletter that featured articles about faculty research. It subsequently evolved into a magazine of the same name. In 2016, we rebranded as Chicago Booth Review. Chicago Booth’s insistence on robust data, careful analysis, and rigorous models has characterized the Chicago Approach, and it’s our guiding value. Chicago has a long and proud tradition of debate and discussion. We welcome your comments and contributions. Listen: www.chicagobooth.edu/review/podcast

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Foreign Investment Watch

None, None, Boston, MA, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749
http://www.foreigninvestmentwatch.com

Foreign Investment Watch is the only independent information service covering the intersection of foreign investment and national security. From CFIUS to global regulatory regimes in the EU and Far East, Foreign Investment Watch provides its subscribers exclusive intelligence and data, including a downloadable spreadsheet of CFIUS disclosures updated weekly. The publication reaches more than 10,000 executives at global financial services firms, law firms, corporations, and startups, as well as sovereign wealth funds and regulators in the U.S. and abroad. Founded by media experts who cut their teeth at The New York Times Company Digital and Boston Globe Electronic Publishing, FIW is relentlessly focused on serving its subscribers and does not accept advertising.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-booth-review.jpeg
Chicago Booth Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foreigninvestmentwatch.jpeg
Foreign Investment Watch
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chicago Booth Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foreign Investment Watch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Booth Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foreign Investment Watch in 2025.

Incident History — Chicago Booth Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Booth Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foreign Investment Watch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foreign Investment Watch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-booth-review.jpeg
Chicago Booth Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foreigninvestmentwatch.jpeg
Foreign Investment Watch
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Chicago Booth Review company and Foreign Investment Watch company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Foreign Investment Watch company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chicago Booth Review company.

In the current year, Foreign Investment Watch company and Chicago Booth Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foreign Investment Watch company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foreign Investment Watch company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foreign Investment Watch company nor Chicago Booth Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Foreign Investment Watch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Foreign Investment Watch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chicago Booth Review company nor Foreign Investment Watch company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chicago Booth Review company employs more people globally than Foreign Investment Watch company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Foreign Investment Watch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Foreign Investment Watch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Foreign Investment Watch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Foreign Investment Watch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Foreign Investment Watch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chicago Booth Review nor Foreign Investment Watch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References