Comparison Overview

Chicago Architecture Center

VS

Desert Botanical Garden

Chicago Architecture Center

111 E Wacker Dr, Chicago, Illinois, 60601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://architecture.org

When you hit the pavement on one of our 75+ walking tours through Chicago neighborhoods, embark on our award-winning river cruise or visit the stunning riverfront Center, you’re helping fund youth education initiatives, world-renowned events like Open House Chicago and public information campaigns that empower citizens to take an active role in the future of their cities. As a certified nonprofit, all CAC ticket purchases directly support our education efforts and community engagement projects.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 131
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Desert Botanical Garden

1201 N Galvin Parkway, Phoenix, Az, 85008, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dbg.org

The Desert Botanical Garden's commitment to the community is to advance excellence in education, research, exhibition, and conservation of desert plants of the world with an emphasis on the Southwestern United States. We will ensure that the Garden is always a compelling attraction that brings to like the many wonders of the desert.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 198
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-architecture-center.jpeg
Chicago Architecture Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/desert-botanical-garden.jpeg
Desert Botanical Garden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chicago Architecture Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Desert Botanical Garden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Architecture Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Desert Botanical Garden in 2025.

Incident History — Chicago Architecture Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Architecture Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Desert Botanical Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Desert Botanical Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-architecture-center.jpeg
Chicago Architecture Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/desert-botanical-garden.jpeg
Desert Botanical Garden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Desert Botanical Garden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Architecture Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Desert Botanical Garden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chicago Architecture Center company.

In the current year, Desert Botanical Garden company and Chicago Architecture Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden company nor Chicago Architecture Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden company nor Chicago Architecture Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Desert Botanical Garden company nor Chicago Architecture Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center company nor Desert Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center nor Desert Botanical Garden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center company nor Desert Botanical Garden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Desert Botanical Garden company employs more people globally than Chicago Architecture Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center nor Desert Botanical Garden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center nor Desert Botanical Garden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center nor Desert Botanical Garden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center nor Desert Botanical Garden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center nor Desert Botanical Garden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chicago Architecture Center nor Desert Botanical Garden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References