Comparison Overview

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.

VS

National Music Centre

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Cheyenne Depot Museum is housed in the newly renovated Union Pacific Depot in downtown Cheyenne. The museum tells the story about the establishment of Cheyenne during the construction of the Transcontinental Railroad, the operation of the Union Pacific Railroad and the history of the construction of the Union Pacific Depot.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Music Centre

850 4 Street SE , Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1R1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

National Music Centre | Centre National de Musique gives Canada a place that amplifies the love, the sharing and the understanding of music through collections that serve as a foundation for public education programs, presenting performances, the development of new music and fostering partnerships across the Canadian musical spectrum. Mission To give Canada a place that amplifies the love, the sharing and the understanding of music. Vision To be a national catalyst for discovery, innovation and renewal through music.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-music-centre.jpeg
National Music Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Music Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Music Centre in 2025.

Incident History — Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Music Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Music Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-music-centre.jpeg
National Music Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Music Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Music Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company.

In the current year, National Music Centre company and Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Music Centre company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Music Centre company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Music Centre company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company nor National Music Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor National Music Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company nor National Music Centre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Music Centre company employs more people globally than Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor National Music Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor National Music Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor National Music Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor National Music Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor National Music Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor National Music Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X