Comparison Overview

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.

VS

Kansas City Automotive Museum

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cheyennedepotmuseum.org

The Cheyenne Depot Museum is housed in the newly renovated Union Pacific Depot in downtown Cheyenne. The museum tells the story about the establishment of Cheyenne during the construction of the Transcontinental Railroad, the operation of the Union Pacific Railroad and the history of the construction of the Union Pacific Depot.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kansas City Automotive Museum

15095W. 116th Street, Olathe, KS, 66062, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kansascityautomuseum.com

The Kansas City Automotive Museum brings the rich automotive legacy of Greater Kansas City to life! From classic cars to interactive exhibits, we celebrate the region’s pivotal role in automotive and motorcycle manufacturing, racing, and culture. Our mission? To preserve history, spark passion, and connect car enthusiasts across generations. Since opening in 2014, our 501(c)(3) non-profit museum in Olathe, KS, has become a vibrant hub for car lovers. With 12,000 square feet of rotating displays featuring iconic vehicles, a children's area, and space for events and car club gatherings, there’s something for everyone. But this is just the beginning—our vision is to expand into a 60,000+ square foot facility, taking Kansas City’s automotive story to the next level. Come for the cars, stay for the stories, and be part of our growing community. Visit us at 116th & Strang Line Road in Olathe, KS, or explore online at www.kansascityautomuseum.com. For questions or to get involved, email us at [email protected]. Let’s drive the legacy forward together!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kansas-city-automotive-museum.jpeg
Kansas City Automotive Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kansas City Automotive Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kansas City Automotive Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kansas City Automotive Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kansas City Automotive Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kansas-city-automotive-museum.jpeg
Kansas City Automotive Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kansas City Automotive Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kansas City Automotive Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company.

In the current year, Kansas City Automotive Museum company and Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kansas City Automotive Museum company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kansas City Automotive Museum company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kansas City Automotive Museum company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company nor Kansas City Automotive Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Kansas City Automotive Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company nor Kansas City Automotive Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kansas City Automotive Museum company employs more people globally than Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Kansas City Automotive Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Kansas City Automotive Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Kansas City Automotive Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Kansas City Automotive Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Kansas City Automotive Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Kansas City Automotive Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References