Comparison Overview

Chevalier

VS

Inca Digital Printers

Chevalier

Nijverheidsweg 46, Hendrik Ido Ambacht, undefined, 3341 LJ, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Chevalier is gespecialieerd in de productie en het management van commercieel drukwerk. Sinds de oprichting in 1916 heeft Chevalier zich ontwikkeld tot een van de grootste en meest moderne zelfstandige grafimedia ondernemingen in Europa met als onderscheidend vermogen productkwaliteit, proceskwaliteit, service en duurzaamheid. Sinds 1 januari 2009 is Chevalier een CO2 neutrale onderneming.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 152
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Inca Digital Printers

515 Coldhams Lane, Cambridge, undefined, CB1 3JS, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Inca Digital Printers Ltd. is a global industry leader in the design, development and manufacture of wide-format inkjet printers for the print industry. These high performance, large format colour printers utilise the latest inkjet technology. Originally formed in 2000, Inca was the first company to design and manufacture a moving table flatbed printer for the printing industry with the Eagle 44. Since then the company has proved itself as an innovator and leader in the field of inkjet. In 2007, the launch of the Inca Onset created a paradigm shift in digital print quality, delivering a digital press that for the first time could really take screen printing volume. Since the launch of the Onset, Inca has expanded its range with the Onset S20i, Onset S40i and Onset Q40i. With this ongoing product development Inca continuously seeks new solutions to the challenges their customers encounter.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chevalier.jpeg
Chevalier
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inca-digital-printers.jpeg
Inca Digital Printers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chevalier
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inca Digital Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chevalier in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inca Digital Printers in 2025.

Incident History — Chevalier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chevalier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inca Digital Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inca Digital Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chevalier.jpeg
Chevalier
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inca-digital-printers.jpeg
Inca Digital Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chevalier company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Inca Digital Printers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Inca Digital Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chevalier company.

In the current year, Inca Digital Printers company and Chevalier company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Inca Digital Printers company nor Chevalier company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Inca Digital Printers company nor Chevalier company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inca Digital Printers company nor Chevalier company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chevalier company nor Inca Digital Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chevalier nor Inca Digital Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Inca Digital Printers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Chevalier company.

Chevalier company employs more people globally than Inca Digital Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Chevalier nor Inca Digital Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chevalier nor Inca Digital Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chevalier nor Inca Digital Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chevalier nor Inca Digital Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chevalier nor Inca Digital Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chevalier nor Inca Digital Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L