Comparison Overview

Cheuvreux

VS

Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney

Cheuvreux

55 Boulevard Haussmann, Paris Cedex 08, undefined, undefined, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Acteur majeur du notariat, le groupe Cheuvreux est composé aujourd’hui de 6 études, l’Etude Cheuvreux à Paris, ainsi que Cheuvreux Reims, Cheuvreux Lyon, Cheuvreux Nice, Cheuvreux Tours et Cheuvreux Rennes. Entrepreneur dans l’âme et promoteur du notariat sans frontières, le Groupe se développe aussi à l’international. Avec plus de 300 collaborateurs, Cheuvreux accompagne ses clients en les plaçant au cœur de sa réflexion. S’appuyant sur un modèle unique, le Groupe a développé des savoir-faire de spécialiste dans cinq domaines d’expertise reconnus : Développement immobilier, Investissement & arbitrage, Financement immobilier, Immobilier résidentiel et Patrimoine.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 316
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney

6 Roche Court, Oxenford, 4210, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

A sole proprietorship offering personalised service to Gold Coast (Australia) and international clients. I help innovative individuals and companies to build cost-effective and relevant patent portfolios. My clients enjoy a personal and responsive service. My technical fields are mining, mechanical and software engineering. I speak regularly at the American Bar Association's IP conferences on various topics relating to Australian patent practice. These have included patent prosecution strategies and the protection of computer-related inventions in Australia.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cheuvreux.jpeg
Cheuvreux
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cheuvreux
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cheuvreux in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney in 2025.

Incident History — Cheuvreux (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cheuvreux cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cheuvreux.jpeg
Cheuvreux
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cheuvreux company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cheuvreux company.

In the current year, Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company and Cheuvreux company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company nor Cheuvreux company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company nor Cheuvreux company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company nor Cheuvreux company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cheuvreux company nor Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cheuvreux nor Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cheuvreux company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company.

Cheuvreux company employs more people globally than Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cheuvreux nor Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cheuvreux nor Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cheuvreux nor Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cheuvreux nor Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cheuvreux nor Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cheuvreux nor Barry Eagar - Australian Patent Attorney holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X