Comparison Overview

Chester Upland School District

VS

Val Verde Unified School District

Chester Upland School District

undefined, Chester, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)

Strong

The Chester Upland School District is a midsized, urban public school district serving the City of Chester, the Borough of Upland and Chester Township in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. Located between Philadelphia and Wilmington, Delaware, the District educates about 3,200 students in grades Pre-K โ€“ 12, with a student-teacher ratio of 16 to 1. About 203 teachers make up the classroom staff.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 337
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Val Verde Unified School District

975 Morgan St, None, Perris, CA, US, 92571
Last Update: 2025-07-28 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Val Verde Unified School District is located in the heart of the Inland Empire, approximately 72 miles east of Los Angeles. Neighboring the district and its communities are March Air Force Base and the Lake Perris recreational area. During the 2017-18 school year, the districtโ€™s schools served 20,245 students residing in the rural and suburban communities of Perris, Moreno Valley, and portions of unincorporated Riverside County. The district currently operates a preschool, 12 elementary schools, 4 middle schools, 2 comprehensive high schools, a student success academy, a virtual academy, and a continuation high school.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 1,289
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chester-upland-school-district.jpeg
Chester Upland School District
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/val-verde-unified-school-district.jpeg
Val Verde Unified School District
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Chester Upland School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Val Verde Unified School District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chester Upland School District in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Val Verde Unified School District in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Chester Upland School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chester Upland School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Val Verde Unified School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Val Verde Unified School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chester-upland-school-district.jpeg
Chester Upland School District
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unknown
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/val-verde-unified-school-district.jpeg
Val Verde Unified School District
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Chester Upland School District company and Val Verde Unified School District company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Chester Upland School District and Val Verde Unified School District have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Val Verde Unified School District company and Chester Upland School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Val Verde Unified School District company nor Chester Upland School District company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Val Verde Unified School District company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Chester Upland School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Chester Upland School District company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Val Verde Unified School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Chester Upland School District company nor Val Verde Unified School District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chester Upland School District company nor Val Verde Unified School District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Val Verde Unified School District company employs more people globally than Chester Upland School District company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X