Comparison Overview

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare

VS

Rush University Medical Center

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare

736 Battlefield Boulevard, North, Chesapeake, VA, US, 23320
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://chesapeakeregional.com

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare is a health system laser focused on innovation, known for making medical history in the region and providing patients with truly personal care. It’s hospital, Chesapeake Regional Medical Center, is the only independent, community-based hospital in Hampton Roads. With the best heart attack survival rates of the major systems in the region (risk adjusted), a nationally accredited Chest Pain Center, and open-heart surgical care coming in 2024. The system has a state-of-the-art neurointerventional suite, comprehensive cancer care, the most preferred Labor & Delivery program in the area, nearly 40 practice locations and approximately 600 physicians on staff. Chesapeake Regional Healthcare’s technologically advanced health care saves lives every day. Learn more at ChesapeakeRegional.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,318
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Rush University Medical Center

1620 W Harrison St, Chicago, 60612, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.rush.edu

Rush University Medical Center is an academic medical center that includes a 671-bed hospital serving adults and children, the 61-bed Johnston R. Bowman Health Center and Rush University. Rush University is home to one of the first medical colleges in the Midwest and one of the nation's top-ranked nursing colleges, as well as graduate programs in allied health, health systems management and biomedical research. The medical center also offers more than 70 highly selective residency and fellowship programs in medical and surgical specialties and subspecialties. For more than 170 years, Rush has been leading the way in developing innovative and often life-saving treatments. Today, Rush is a thriving center for basic and clinical research, with physicians and scientists involved in hundreds of research projects developing and testing the effectiveness and safety of new therapies and medical devices. In addition to its mission in patient care, education and research, Rush maintains a strong commitment to the community. Rush reaches out to the Chicago community through such offerings as the Rush Community Services Initiatives Program, an umbrella for several student-led outreach programs designed to address the social and health care needs of residents in neighboring communities.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,083
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chesapeake-regional-medical-center.jpeg
Chesapeake Regional Healthcare
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rush-university-medical-center.jpeg
Rush University Medical Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chesapeake Regional Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rush University Medical Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chesapeake Regional Healthcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rush University Medical Center in 2025.

Incident History — Chesapeake Regional Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rush University Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rush University Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chesapeake-regional-medical-center.jpeg
Chesapeake Regional Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2015
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rush-university-medical-center.jpeg
Rush University Medical Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access/Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Rush University Medical Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Rush University Medical Center company.

In the current year, Rush University Medical Center company and Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rush University Medical Center company nor Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rush University Medical Center company nor Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rush University Medical Center company nor Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company nor Rush University Medical Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Rush University Medical Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rush University Medical Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company.

Rush University Medical Center company employs more people globally than Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Rush University Medical Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Rush University Medical Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Rush University Medical Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Rush University Medical Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Rush University Medical Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Rush University Medical Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References