Comparison Overview

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare

VS

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare

736 Battlefield Boulevard, North, Chesapeake, VA, US, 23320
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare is a health system laser focused on innovation, known for making medical history in the region and providing patients with truly personal care. It’s hospital, Chesapeake Regional Medical Center, is the only independent, community-based hospital in Hampton Roads. With the best heart attack survival rates of the major systems in the region (risk adjusted), a nationally accredited Chest Pain Center, and open-heart surgical care coming in 2024. The system has a state-of-the-art neurointerventional suite, comprehensive cancer care, the most preferred Labor & Delivery program in the area, nearly 40 practice locations and approximately 600 physicians on staff. Chesapeake Regional Healthcare’s technologically advanced health care saves lives every day. Learn more at ChesapeakeRegional.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 1,318
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica

Av. Paulista 867, São Paulo, 01311-100, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Com cerca de 80 anos de experiência, a Hapvida é hoje a maior empresa de saúde integrada da América Latina. A companhia, que possui mais de 69 mil colaboradores, atende quase 16 milhões de beneficiários de saúde e odontologia espalhados pelas cinco regiões do Brasil. Todo o aparato foi construído a partir de uma visão voltada ao cuidado de ponta a ponta, a partir 87 hospitais, 77 prontos atendimentos, 341 clínicas médicas e 291 centros de diagnóstico por imagem e coleta laboratorial, além de unidades especificamente voltadas ao cuidado preventivo e crônico. Dessa combinação de negócios, apoiada em qualidade médica e inovação, resulta uma empresa com os melhores recursos humanos e tecnológicos para os seus clientes.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 35,445
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chesapeake-regional-medical-center.jpeg
Chesapeake Regional Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapvida.jpeg
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chesapeake Regional Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chesapeake Regional Healthcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica in 2025.

Incident History — Chesapeake Regional Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chesapeake-regional-medical-center.jpeg
Chesapeake Regional Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2015
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapvida.jpeg
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company and Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company nor Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company nor Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company nor Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica company employs more people globally than Chesapeake Regional Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chesapeake Regional Healthcare nor Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N