Comparison Overview

Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities

VS

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.

Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities

3510 Cummings Road, Chattanooga, TN, 37419-2317, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Cherokee Truck Equipment is your source for truck & utility vehicle equipment, parts service & more. Our Top Quality product offering includes everything from aerial man lifts, buckets trucks, contractor vans, garbage/refuse collection equipment, hi-rail gear ( for railroad applications), lift gates, lube bodies, salt spreaders, snow plows, street sweepers, truck mounted cranes (Telescoping & Articulating) utility/service bodies, & plenty more. Proudly part of the ML Utilities family, we've been a cornerstone in the truck equipment industry for over four decades. With two locations in Chattanooga, TN, we bring top-notch service and upfitting to the Southeast and beyond. Explore our offerings on our e-commerce platforms on eBay and Amazon, where quality meets convenience. Your journey to superior truck equipment starts here.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.

1819 Denver West Dr., Lakewood, CO 80401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. is a key supplier of concrete ties to America’s largest freight railroads, as well as the United States’ only High Speed Rail project. Along with many transit projects and industrial applications, our experience in designing concrete ties is the most reliable and cost effective in the world. . The Rocla Concrete Tie Advantage: - Stronger track structure for increased rail life - Lower annual maintenance costs - Engineered product with established performance - Exceptional resitance to weathering and corrosion - Improved track surface, alignment, and gauge holding performance - Energy efficient by reducing locomotive fuel consumption Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. was acquired in 2017. Please follow Vossloh North America

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cherokee-truck-equipment-llc.jpeg
Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rocla-concrete-tie-inc-.jpeg
Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cherokee-truck-equipment-llc.jpeg
Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rocla-concrete-tie-inc-.jpeg
Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company.

In the current year, Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company and Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company nor Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company nor Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company nor Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. company employs more people globally than Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cherokee Truck Equipment | A Division of ML Utilities nor Rocla Concrete Tie, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H