Comparison Overview

Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center

VS

Restore Oregon

Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center

507 S 4th St, Enid, Oklahoma, 73701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center is a museum and research center where visitors can explore the history of northwest Oklahoma. The Heritage Center includes a permanent exhibit gallery and temporary exhibit gallery that explore the history and culture of northwestern Oklahoma. The Humphrey Heritage Village, which is a collection of four historically significant buildings, includes the only remaining U.S. Land Office in Oklahoma. The Center and the grounds are fully accessible to all visitors.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Restore Oregon

1327 SE Tacoma St, #114, Portland, Oregon, US, 97202
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1977, Restore Oregon is a statewide, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, supported by members/donors, led by a volunteer board, and staffed by professionals, who help people save and revitalize historic places and spaces. We work on the front lines and behind the scenes to leverage relationships, resources, and creativity to preserve, protect, and pass forward Oregon's heritage. Restore Oregon promotes inclusive historic preservation as a means of preserving our region’s cultural heritage, and as a tool for solving challenges such as insufficient affordable housing, stalled economic development, and negative impacts from climate change. We advocate for effective policies and incentives, deliver quality educational programs, and directly intervene to save endangered places that matter to Oregonians.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cherokee-strip-regional-heritage-center.jpeg
Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/restore-oregon.jpeg
Restore Oregon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Restore Oregon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Restore Oregon in 2025.

Incident History — Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Restore Oregon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Restore Oregon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cherokee-strip-regional-heritage-center.jpeg
Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/restore-oregon.jpeg
Restore Oregon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Restore Oregon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Restore Oregon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company.

In the current year, Restore Oregon company and Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Restore Oregon company nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Restore Oregon company nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Restore Oregon company nor Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company nor Restore Oregon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center nor Restore Oregon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company nor Restore Oregon company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Restore Oregon company employs more people globally than Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center nor Restore Oregon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center nor Restore Oregon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center nor Restore Oregon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center nor Restore Oregon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center nor Restore Oregon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cherokee Strip Regional Heritage Center nor Restore Oregon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X