Comparison Overview

Cherokee Casino

VS

Resorts Casino Tunica

Cherokee Casino

777 W Cherokee St, Catoosa, 74015, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

For more than two decades, Cherokee Casino has been Oklahoma’s premier destination for gaming, live entertainment and extraordinary experiences. The brand currently owns and operates nine properties across Northeastern Oklahoma. Each features its own unique offerings yet all share in Cherokee Casino's commitment to quality. Guests can enjoy slots and table games, multiple hotels, a delicious array of dining options, live entertainment from local and national acts, horse racing, golf, a KOA campground, meeting and event space, and monthly promotions. Cherokee Casino also offers players impressive perks and benefits through One Star Rewards. As the brand continues to expand its offerings and footprint, Cherokee Casino remains dedicated to the well-being of the Cherokee Nation and the communities that it calls home.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 186
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Resorts Casino Tunica

1100 CASINO STRIP BLVD, ROBINSONVILLE, Mississippi, 38664, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

A PROUD MARQUEE REWARDS CASINO At Resorts Casino Tunica, a spacious 35,000-square-foot casino floor filled with your favorite games is just the beginning of your premier gaming getaway. The casino stage lights up the night with the greatest tunes in town, while each of Resorts’ three restaurants fills you up with the best in burgers, steaks and buffet-style dining! And when you decide to call it a night, Resorts Casino Tunica has over 200 premier hotel rooms, so you can rest up for another action-packed day.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cherokee-casino.jpeg
Cherokee Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resorts-casino-tunica.jpeg
Resorts Casino Tunica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cherokee Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Resorts Casino Tunica
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cherokee Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Resorts Casino Tunica in 2025.

Incident History — Cherokee Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cherokee Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Resorts Casino Tunica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resorts Casino Tunica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cherokee-casino.jpeg
Cherokee Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resorts-casino-tunica.jpeg
Resorts Casino Tunica
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cherokee Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Resorts Casino Tunica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Resorts Casino Tunica company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cherokee Casino company.

In the current year, Resorts Casino Tunica company and Cherokee Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Resorts Casino Tunica company nor Cherokee Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Resorts Casino Tunica company nor Cherokee Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Resorts Casino Tunica company nor Cherokee Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cherokee Casino company nor Resorts Casino Tunica company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cherokee Casino nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Resorts Casino Tunica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cherokee Casino company.

Cherokee Casino company employs more people globally than Resorts Casino Tunica company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Cherokee Casino nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cherokee Casino nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cherokee Casino nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cherokee Casino nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cherokee Casino nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cherokee Casino nor Resorts Casino Tunica holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H