Comparison Overview

CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION

VS

Transport Heritage NSW

CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://chemheritage.org

CHF fosters dialogue on science and technology in society. Our staff and fellows study the past in order to understand the present and inform the future. We focus on matter and materials and their effect on our modern world in territory ranging from the physical sciences and industries, through the chemical sciences and engineering, to the life sciences and technologies. We collect, preserve, and exhibit historical artifacts; engage communities of scientists and engineers; and tell the stories of the people behind breakthroughs and innovations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Transport Heritage NSW

500 Harris St, Ultimo, New South Wales, AU, 2005
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thnsw.com.au

Transport Heritage NSW (THNSW) is a not-for-profit, member-based organisation operating under four primary pillars: Museums - Operation of two public rail heritage attractions in NSW - NSW Rail Museum and Valley Heights Locomotive Depot Heritage Museum Heritage Events & Experiences - Operation of heritage train experiences at the NSW Rail Museum and throughout NSW - Delivering major events, activities and education programs at the NSW Rail Museum and throughout NSW Sector Development - Providing a leadership role and delivering a range of support activities to the transport heritage sector on behalf of the NSW Government Heritage & Collection Management - Managing a portfolio of primarily rail heritage assets owned by the NSW Government on behalf of Transport for NSW

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-heritage-nsw.jpeg
Transport Heritage NSW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transport Heritage NSW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport Heritage NSW in 2025.

Incident History — CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transport Heritage NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport Heritage NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transport-heritage-nsw.jpeg
Transport Heritage NSW
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transport Heritage NSW company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Transport Heritage NSW company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company.

In the current year, Transport Heritage NSW company and CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW company nor CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW company nor CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transport Heritage NSW company nor CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company nor Transport Heritage NSW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Transport Heritage NSW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company nor Transport Heritage NSW company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Transport Heritage NSW company employs more people globally than CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Transport Heritage NSW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Transport Heritage NSW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Transport Heritage NSW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Transport Heritage NSW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Transport Heritage NSW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Transport Heritage NSW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References