Comparison Overview

CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION

VS

Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh

CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

CHF fosters dialogue on science and technology in society. Our staff and fellows study the past in order to understand the present and inform the future. We focus on matter and materials and their effect on our modern world in territory ranging from the physical sciences and industries, through the chemical sciences and engineering, to the life sciences and technologies. We collect, preserve, and exhibit historical artifacts; engage communities of scientists and engineers; and tell the stories of the people behind breakthroughs and innovations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh

4400 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Established in 1895 by Andrew Carnegie, Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh is a collection of four dynamic, distinctive museums: Carnegie Museum of Art, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Carnegie Science Center, and The Andy Warhol Museum. In 2013, the museums reached nearly 1.3 million people through exhibitions, educational programs, outreach activities, and special events. We are the largest, most far-reaching cultural organization in the Pittsburgh region, known throughout the world for our vast art and scientific collections and research. We're also a community leader in educational outreach, helping to teach more than 350,000 children a year through onsite and offsite education programs. Our mission: To serve as a catalyst and source of growth and knowledge; offer a home to thinking and inquisitive children and adults; act as a collector, guardian, and interactive presenter of cultural and scientific treasures and ideas; and support the community by attracting visitors and promoting economic development. More than 100,000 people call themselves Carnegie Museums Members from more than 25,000 member households. Carnegie Museums employs more than 1,000 people and directs more than $25 million to the region’s economy in salary and benefits.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 291
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carnegie-museums-of-pittsburgh.jpeg
Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh in 2026.

Incident History — CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carnegie-museums-of-pittsburgh.jpeg
Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company.

In the current year, Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company and CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company nor CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company nor CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company nor CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh company employs more people globally than CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION nor Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H