Comparison Overview

Chemical Consultants Inc

VS

Abbott Label, Inc.

Chemical Consultants Inc

1850 Wild Turkey Circle, Corona, CA, US, 92880
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccidom.com

Chemical Consultants Inc., is the pioneer in formulating and manufacturing of compliance chemicals for the screenprinting industry. CCI has further expanded its expertise by manufacturing premium emulsions for any application. Also by partnering with some of the worlds finest mills, CCI is able to supply the screenprinting industry premium mesh at an affordable price. In addition to the extensive and still growing product line, CCI continues to lead the industry in automated screen cleaning and reclaiming equipment that offer advanced features and user friendly functions. It is our commitment to catering to the ever demanding needs of the industry that will enable CCI to continue to lead the way in the 21st century.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Abbott Label, Inc.

11440 Hillguard Road, Dallas, 75243, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abbottlabel.com

Abbott Label is a manufacturer of stock and custom labels, ribbons and tags. Abbott Label specializes in quick turn around custom labels and carries a full line of stock thermal transfer / direct thermal labels; laser labels continuous pin-fed labels, tags and thermal transfer ribbons. Abbott Label equipment allows us to be competitive on short run, long run, narrow web or wide web. We use only the premier vendors in our industry whether press manufacturer, die maker, material manufacturer or ink supplier. We sell only to dealers, distributors and re-sellers; we do not sell directly to the end user.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 140
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chemical-consultants-inc.jpeg
Chemical Consultants Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abbott-label.jpeg
Abbott Label, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chemical Consultants Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Abbott Label, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chemical Consultants Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abbott Label, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Chemical Consultants Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chemical Consultants Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Abbott Label, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abbott Label, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chemical-consultants-inc.jpeg
Chemical Consultants Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abbott-label.jpeg
Abbott Label, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Chemical Consultants Inc company and Abbott Label, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Abbott Label, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chemical Consultants Inc company.

In the current year, Abbott Label, Inc. company and Chemical Consultants Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Abbott Label, Inc. company nor Chemical Consultants Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Abbott Label, Inc. company nor Chemical Consultants Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Abbott Label, Inc. company nor Chemical Consultants Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc company nor Abbott Label, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc nor Abbott Label, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc company nor Abbott Label, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Abbott Label, Inc. company employs more people globally than Chemical Consultants Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc nor Abbott Label, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc nor Abbott Label, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc nor Abbott Label, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc nor Abbott Label, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc nor Abbott Label, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chemical Consultants Inc nor Abbott Label, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References