Comparison Overview

The Chelsea Magazine Company

VS

Cambridge University Press

The Chelsea Magazine Company

Jubilee House, London, undefined, SW3 3TQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Chelsea Magazine Company, part of the Telegraph Media Group, is an award-winning publisher of specialist magazines and digital content. Based in London, our brands fall into three portfolios: Travel & Lifestyle, Education and Sports. A team of 75 talented employees produces high quality content that is enjoyed by more than 2.5 million readers every month in print and online.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cambridge University Press

Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, Please select a state..., Cambridge University Press, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Unlocking potential with the best learning and research solutions. We combine publishing excellence with innovation to meet the needs of our customers, authors and partners. Our publications, research, and higher education solutions spread knowledge, spark curiosity and aid understanding around the world. We are the academic and Bibles publisher of Cambridge University Press & Assessment. View our social media commenting policy here: https://cup.org/38e0Gv2

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chelsea-magazines.jpeg
The Chelsea Magazine Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridgeuniversitypress.jpeg
Cambridge University Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Chelsea Magazine Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cambridge University Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Chelsea Magazine Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cambridge University Press in 2025.

Incident History — The Chelsea Magazine Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Chelsea Magazine Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cambridge University Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cambridge University Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chelsea-magazines.jpeg
The Chelsea Magazine Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cambridgeuniversitypress.jpeg
Cambridge University Press
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

The Chelsea Magazine Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cambridge University Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cambridge University Press company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The Chelsea Magazine Company company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cambridge University Press company and The Chelsea Magazine Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cambridge University Press company nor The Chelsea Magazine Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Cambridge University Press company has disclosed at least one data breach, while The Chelsea Magazine Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cambridge University Press company nor The Chelsea Magazine Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Chelsea Magazine Company company nor Cambridge University Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Chelsea Magazine Company nor Cambridge University Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cambridge University Press company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Chelsea Magazine Company company.

The Chelsea Magazine Company company employs more people globally than Cambridge University Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The Chelsea Magazine Company nor Cambridge University Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Chelsea Magazine Company nor Cambridge University Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Chelsea Magazine Company nor Cambridge University Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Chelsea Magazine Company nor Cambridge University Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Chelsea Magazine Company nor Cambridge University Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Chelsea Magazine Company nor Cambridge University Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.