Comparison Overview

Center for Health Care Strategies

VS

PROSPEKTIKER

Center for Health Care Strategies

300 American Metro Blvd., Ste. 125, None, Hamilton, NJ, US, 08619
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The Center for Health Care Strategies (CHCS) is a policy design and implementation partner devoted to improving outcomes for people enrolled in #Medicaid. For 30 years, we have collaborated with state Medicaid and related health and human services agencies across the country to shape how health care services are designed, financed, and delivered. For more information, visit www.chcs.org. CHCS seeks mission-driven individuals who are passionate about improving health care delivery to join our team. To learn about current career opportunities at CHCS, visit www.chcs.org/careers.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PROSPEKTIKER

Parque Empresarial Zuatzu, Edif. Urumea, Planta 1ª, Local 1, Zubiberri Bidea 31, Donostia - San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, ES, 20018
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Empresa creada en 1987, es una estructura independiente de reflexión y de estudios prospectivo-estratégicos dirigida tanto al sector público como al privado y destinada a examinar cuáles son los futuros posibles que oculta el mundo contemporáneo y que se basa en tres convicciones: "El porvenir no nos viene determinado"​. "El porvenir se construye. No existirá libertad de elección y de actuación sin que exista una actitud de previsión"​. "El porvenir está sujeto a grandes dosis de incertidumbre y de riesgo. Para no hipotecarlo, es necesario optimizar los medios y recursos disponibles, utilizando la prospectiva estratégica como herramienta de trabajo"​. Los objetivos en los que se centra la labor de Prospektiker son los siguientes: - Detectar las innovaciones, ideas y hechos portadores de futuro. - Descubrir las tendencias de primer orden y emergentes que determinan el abanico de los futuros posibles. - Evaluar las inflexiones posibles, los impactos que puedan entrañar y las apuestas que son necesarias afrontar. - Asegurar un papel de vigía respecto a los factores que ejercen una influencia sobre la evolución a medio y largo plazo, identificando los problemas y examinando aquellas estrategias que puedan en consecuencia ser adoptadas. Trabajamos en red con una importante red de socios, tanto locales como internacionales. Nuestra actividad se centra en: - Asesoramiento en gestión y evaluación de políticas y programas. - Desarrollo de observatorios y sistemas vigías. - Planificación prospectivo-estratégica.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chcshealth.jpeg
Center for Health Care Strategies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prospektiker.jpeg
PROSPEKTIKER
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Health Care Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PROSPEKTIKER
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Health Care Strategies in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PROSPEKTIKER in 2025.

Incident History — Center for Health Care Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Health Care Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PROSPEKTIKER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PROSPEKTIKER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chcshealth.jpeg
Center for Health Care Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prospektiker.jpeg
PROSPEKTIKER
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Health Care Strategies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PROSPEKTIKER company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PROSPEKTIKER company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Health Care Strategies company.

In the current year, PROSPEKTIKER company and Center for Health Care Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PROSPEKTIKER company nor Center for Health Care Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PROSPEKTIKER company nor Center for Health Care Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PROSPEKTIKER company nor Center for Health Care Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Health Care Strategies company nor PROSPEKTIKER company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Health Care Strategies nor PROSPEKTIKER holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Center for Health Care Strategies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PROSPEKTIKER company.

Center for Health Care Strategies company employs more people globally than PROSPEKTIKER company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Center for Health Care Strategies nor PROSPEKTIKER holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Health Care Strategies nor PROSPEKTIKER holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Health Care Strategies nor PROSPEKTIKER holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Health Care Strategies nor PROSPEKTIKER holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Health Care Strategies nor PROSPEKTIKER holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Health Care Strategies nor PROSPEKTIKER holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X