Comparison Overview

Chautauqua Theater Company

VS

Sacred Fools Theater

Chautauqua Theater Company

1 Ames Avenue, Bratton Theater, Chautauqua, New York, US, 14722
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
theater.chq.org

Chautauqua Theater Company (CTC), the resident theater company of Chautauqua Institution, produces high-quality, live theater during Chautauqua’s nine-week Summer Assembly. Committed to the development of new work and the next generation of theater artists, CTC offers the best in classical, contemporary, and new plays featuring a company of internationally acclaimed professional actors, directors, designers, playwrights, and faculty, alongside the finest emerging actors in the country. Under the leadership of Producing Artistic Director Jade King Carroll, CTC is dedicated to becoming a national home for exciting new plays: commissioning, developing and producing new and established American playwrights, including the development of Noah Haidle’s Birthday Candles, which went on to premiere on Broadway starring Debra Messing at Roundabout Theatre Company. Productions and workshops in the 2023 season included works by Kate Hamill, Chisa Hutchinson, Sofya Levitsky-Weitz, Mike Lew, and Harrison David Rivers. Chautauqua Theater Company is actively building the brighter future of the American theater.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sacred Fools Theater

undefined, Los Angeles, CA, 90004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://sacredfools.org

Sacred Fools is a critically acclaimed and award-winning theater. We are the original home of the LA stage hits Louis & Keely Live at the Sahara, Watson: the Last Great Tale of the Legendary Sherlock Holmes, Forbidden Zone Live in the 6th Dimension, Stoneface, Neverwhere, Absolutely Filthy, and the long-running late night Serial Killers!

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chautauqua-theater-company.jpeg
Chautauqua Theater Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sacred-fools-theater.jpeg
Sacred Fools Theater
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chautauqua Theater Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sacred Fools Theater
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chautauqua Theater Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sacred Fools Theater in 2025.

Incident History — Chautauqua Theater Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chautauqua Theater Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sacred Fools Theater (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sacred Fools Theater cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chautauqua-theater-company.jpeg
Chautauqua Theater Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sacred-fools-theater.jpeg
Sacred Fools Theater
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Chautauqua Theater Company company and Sacred Fools Theater company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Sacred Fools Theater company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chautauqua Theater Company company.

In the current year, Sacred Fools Theater company and Chautauqua Theater Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sacred Fools Theater company nor Chautauqua Theater Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sacred Fools Theater company nor Chautauqua Theater Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sacred Fools Theater company nor Chautauqua Theater Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company company nor Sacred Fools Theater company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company nor Sacred Fools Theater holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company company nor Sacred Fools Theater company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sacred Fools Theater company employs more people globally than Chautauqua Theater Company company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company nor Sacred Fools Theater holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company nor Sacred Fools Theater holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company nor Sacred Fools Theater holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company nor Sacred Fools Theater holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company nor Sacred Fools Theater holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chautauqua Theater Company nor Sacred Fools Theater holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References