Comparison Overview

Chase Print Group

VS

Design Label & DLMI

Chase Print Group

12 Campbell St, Yarraville, Victoria, 3013, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.chaseprint.com.au

Family owned and run printing company. Proudly manufacturing in Melbourne. Specialising digital printing, offset printing, large format & graphic design. If you are looking for a team that will work with you, who are ready for a challenge and are energised by the satisfaction of another happy client, Chase Print Group is who you are looking for. Give us a go and an opportunity to impress you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Design Label & DLMI

7 Capitol Drive, East Lyme, CT, 06333, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.designlabel.com/

Over 50 years as an experienced, reliable, and trustworthy supplier of label and packaging solutions. Since 1962, Design Label Mfg. Inc.has established itself as a leading label company and supplier of innovative and engineered custom label product and service solution. We manufacture and work with a wide variety of partners to ensure your packaging and product needs are fulfilled. With flexographic, lithographic, and digital printing process, we offer all types of custom labels, including: Pressure Sensitive, Cut & Stack, and in-mold labels, as well as innovative package engineering solutions. We understand that your Brand is important, let us work with you to build custom solutions that fit all of your branding needs. - Technically trained direct sales force and in-house customer service department - Advanced cloud computing- capabilities - Warehousing and inventory management for J.I.T. delivery -Quality controls at every level - UL approved systems and standards to meet the needs of our many ISO 9000 clients - Drop ship to your location via UPS and many other common carriers - Specializing in medium to long label runs - Available Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) - Rush orders available - Extensive tooling reduces die costs www.designlabel.com (800) 536-1575 #designlabelmfg

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chaseprint.jpeg
Chase Print Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-label-inc..jpeg
Design Label & DLMI
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chase Print Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Design Label & DLMI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chase Print Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Label & DLMI in 2025.

Incident History — Chase Print Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chase Print Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Design Label & DLMI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Label & DLMI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chaseprint.jpeg
Chase Print Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-label-inc..jpeg
Design Label & DLMI
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Chase Print Group company and Design Label & DLMI company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Design Label & DLMI company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chase Print Group company.

In the current year, Design Label & DLMI company and Chase Print Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Design Label & DLMI company nor Chase Print Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Design Label & DLMI company nor Chase Print Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Design Label & DLMI company nor Chase Print Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chase Print Group company nor Design Label & DLMI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chase Print Group nor Design Label & DLMI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chase Print Group company nor Design Label & DLMI company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Design Label & DLMI company employs more people globally than Chase Print Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Chase Print Group nor Design Label & DLMI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chase Print Group nor Design Label & DLMI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chase Print Group nor Design Label & DLMI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chase Print Group nor Design Label & DLMI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chase Print Group nor Design Label & DLMI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chase Print Group nor Design Label & DLMI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References