Comparison Overview

Chase Litigation Services, Inc.

VS

Penn Law LLC

Chase Litigation Services, Inc.

2300 E. Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, 90740, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Chase Litigation Services has been serving the legal community with superior litigation support services and the nation’s top stenographers for over 30 years. Our goal has always been to provide each client, each firm and their staff the personal attention and outstanding transcripts that they expect and deserve. As a court reporter herself, our President knows exactly what happens when the deposition room door closes, the witness is sworn in and proceedings begin. From exhibits to realtime, her hands-on experience leads the way in answering client needs, large or small, and delivering the best service in the industry.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Penn Law LLC

4200 Northside Parkway, NW Building One Suite 100, Atlanta, Georgia, 30327, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Penn Law LLC, (www.PennLawGroup.com) being the true professionals that help victims and their families put things back together as best as can be done is our passion. We are a “full service” firm, meaning we handle your case from the investigation through trial and even any necessary appeals. Our exceptional trial attorneys have a reputation and track record of success at the highest levels. Civil trial firms and teams co-founded and led by Darren W. Penn secured number one verdicts in six different categories – automotive, products liability, business torts, premises liability, nursing home misconduct, and medical malpractice – in the last 11 years and have more eight-figure verdicts than any other firm in Georgia over that same time period. Our unmatched record of handling complex cases is why many attorneys, including the top personal injury lawyers in the region, refer clients to us to handle their cases, trials, and appeals if necessary.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chase-litigation-services.jpeg
Chase Litigation Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/penn-law-llc.jpeg
Penn Law LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chase Litigation Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Penn Law LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chase Litigation Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Penn Law LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Chase Litigation Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chase Litigation Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Penn Law LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Penn Law LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chase-litigation-services.jpeg
Chase Litigation Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/penn-law-llc.jpeg
Penn Law LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Penn Law LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Penn Law LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, Penn Law LLC company and Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Penn Law LLC company nor Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Penn Law LLC company nor Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Penn Law LLC company nor Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company nor Penn Law LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. nor Penn Law LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company nor Penn Law LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Penn Law LLC company employs more people globally than Chase Litigation Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. nor Penn Law LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. nor Penn Law LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. nor Penn Law LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. nor Penn Law LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. nor Penn Law LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chase Litigation Services, Inc. nor Penn Law LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X