Comparison Overview

Charlotte Works

VS

Baltimore Metropolitan Council

Charlotte Works

8601 McAlpine Park Drive, Ste. 130, Charlotte, NC, US, 28211
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We serve job-seekers and businesses, providing resources to develop a skilled workforce that meets employer needs. Job-seekers can • build a resume and interview skills, • create a career mission statement, • join a job-search team, • network with employers and peers, • attend workshops; and/or • receive an occupational skills or on-the-job training grant. By focusing on gaining a deep understanding of the talent needs of local, relocating and expanding businesses, we tailor resources and training dollars to meet specific industry needs through • customized recruiting tools; • assessment of hiring needs; • training grants for skilled/new/incumbent workers; • workshops; and • valuable local labor market data and forecasts. Graduating with a high school diploma is no longer enough for students entering a more competitive marketplace; additional training is imperative. Youth Works empowers eligible youth ages 16 to 21 (in- and out-of-school) to achieve academic and employment success through • tutoring/dropout-prevention strategies; • summer employment; • paid/unpaid work experiences; • occupational-skills training; • leadership development and more. Our NCWorks Career Centers are unique settings where job-seekers and employers both can access resources to succeed and drive economic growth in our region: • 5601 Executive Center Dr., Ste. 100, 28212; and • 7140 Forest Point Blvd., Ste. A, 28217.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Baltimore Metropolitan Council

1500 Whetstone Way, Suite 300, Baltimore, Maryland, US, 21230
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

ABOUT BMC The Baltimore Metropolitan Council (BMC) is a group of trusted experts who help guide the future of the Baltimore region. We evaluate needs and trends, listen to communities, and develop and implement programs and projects. BMC’s Board of Directors governs the agency and sets our policy agenda. BMC’s staff convenes elected officials, state and local agency specialists, and regional leaders to advance shared priorities in transportation, housing, workforce development, emergency management and more. Through our work, we are committed to making our communities livable, accessible and prosperous for all. ABOUT BRTB The Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the federally designated metropolitan planning organization for the Baltimore region. Staffed by the Baltimore Metropolitan Council, board members include local elected officials as well as local, state and federal agency specialists who guide transportation planning and budgeting. We evaluate needs and trends, listen to communities, and advance shared priorities for the movement of people and goods throughout the Baltimore Region with a focus on safety, equity and resilience. FOR MORE INFORMATION, please visit: http://www.baltometro.org/ Please do not contact BMC employees to inquire about job openings at BMC. Instead, please visit http://www.baltometro.org for listings and instructions.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-works.jpeg
Charlotte Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltimore-metropolitan-council.jpeg
Baltimore Metropolitan Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charlotte Works
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baltimore Metropolitan Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte Works in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baltimore Metropolitan Council in 2025.

Incident History — Charlotte Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baltimore Metropolitan Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baltimore Metropolitan Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-works.jpeg
Charlotte Works
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltimore-metropolitan-council.jpeg
Baltimore Metropolitan Council
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baltimore Metropolitan Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charlotte Works company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Baltimore Metropolitan Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charlotte Works company.

In the current year, Baltimore Metropolitan Council company and Charlotte Works company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baltimore Metropolitan Council company nor Charlotte Works company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baltimore Metropolitan Council company nor Charlotte Works company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baltimore Metropolitan Council company nor Charlotte Works company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charlotte Works company nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charlotte Works nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charlotte Works company nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Baltimore Metropolitan Council company employs more people globally than Charlotte Works company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Charlotte Works nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charlotte Works nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charlotte Works nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charlotte Works nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charlotte Works nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charlotte Works nor Baltimore Metropolitan Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H