Comparison Overview

Charlotte Mecklenburg Library

VS

Hackley Public Library

Charlotte Mecklenburg Library

310 N. Tryon St., Charlotte, NC, 28202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Charlotte Mecklenburg Library is one of America’s leading urban public libraries, serving one of the country’s great emerging metropolitan areas in North Carolina. Our library system serves a community of approximately one million citizens in the city of Charlotte and the towns of Matthews, Pineville, Mint Hill, Davidson, Cornelius and Huntersville – all located in Mecklenburg County. Accessible and welcoming to all, our library celebrates the joy of reading, fosters learning and growth, connects people to each other and the world, and inspires individuals with what they can achieve. Through our 20 locations, online, and through targeted outreach, we deliver exceptional library services and programs with a mission to create a community of readers and empower individuals with free access to information and the universe of ideas. For more information about the Charlotte Mecklenburg Library, visit www.cmlibrary.org. Also look for the Charlotte Mecklenburg Library on Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and YouTube.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 498
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hackley Public Library

316 W Webster Ave, Muskegon, 49440, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Hackley Public Library is dedicated to 1) promoting knowledge, understanding, and wisdom, 2) combating ignorance, intolerance, and indifference, 3) promoting the free exchange of ideas, and 4) conserving our national and local cultural heritage. The mission of the Hackley Public Library is to inform, inspire, and delight our diverse community by providing information, knowledge, literature, new technologies, and traditional and innovative programs.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-mecklenburg-library.jpeg
Charlotte Mecklenburg Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hackley-public-library.jpeg
Hackley Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charlotte Mecklenburg Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hackley Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte Mecklenburg Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hackley Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Charlotte Mecklenburg Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte Mecklenburg Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hackley Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hackley Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-mecklenburg-library.jpeg
Charlotte Mecklenburg Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hackley-public-library.jpeg
Hackley Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hackley Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hackley Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company.

In the current year, Hackley Public Library company and Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hackley Public Library company nor Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hackley Public Library company nor Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hackley Public Library company nor Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company nor Hackley Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library nor Hackley Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company nor Hackley Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Charlotte Mecklenburg Library company employs more people globally than Hackley Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library nor Hackley Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library nor Hackley Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library nor Hackley Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library nor Hackley Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library nor Hackley Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charlotte Mecklenburg Library nor Hackley Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H