Comparison Overview

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development

VS

Delaware Hispanic Commission

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development

18501 Murdock Circle, Port Charlotte, 33948, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Your Business. Cleared for Takeoff. You can feel momentum in the air in Charlotte County, Florida. Things are happening. Just announced: A major partnership with one of America’s premier aviation colleges. Punta Gorda Airport recently completed a multi-million dollar expansion. The economic climate is as sunny as the weather and the landscape looks like a tropical paradise. With a pro-business attitude, leaders willing to invest in the community and fast track approvals, your business can be cleared for takeoff in no time. 4 Reasons Why Charlotte County is a Great Business Location: FAST TRACK APPROVALS TOP FLIGHT LOGISTICS LOWER LAND COSTS QUALITY OF WORK/LIFE View Charlotte County's Social Media Terms of Use at www.CharlotteCountyFL.gov/socialterms.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Delaware Hispanic Commission

None, None, Dover, Delaware, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-13

The Delaware Hispanic Commission was created through Executive Order Number Twenty-EightOpen by then-Governor Jack Markell to advise the Governor, the Cabinet, members of the General Assembly, and other state policymakers on means to improve the delivery of services to the Hispanic community in Delaware. The mission of the DHC is to uphold the impact and needs of the Delaware Hispanic community.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-county-economic-development-office.jpeg
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dehispanic.jpeg
Delaware Hispanic Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Delaware Hispanic Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delaware Hispanic Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Delaware Hispanic Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delaware Hispanic Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlotte-county-economic-development-office.jpeg
Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dehispanic.jpeg
Delaware Hispanic Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Delaware Hispanic Commission company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Delaware Hispanic Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company.

In the current year, Delaware Hispanic Commission company and Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Delaware Hispanic Commission company nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Delaware Hispanic Commission company nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Delaware Hispanic Commission company nor Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company nor Delaware Hispanic Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development nor Delaware Hispanic Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company nor Delaware Hispanic Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development company employs more people globally than Delaware Hispanic Commission company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development nor Delaware Hispanic Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development nor Delaware Hispanic Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development nor Delaware Hispanic Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development nor Delaware Hispanic Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development nor Delaware Hispanic Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charlotte County, Florida Economic Development nor Delaware Hispanic Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N