Comparison Overview

Charlesworth Press

VS

Precision Ink Corporation

Charlesworth Press

Flanshaw Way, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF2 9LP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1928, Charlesworth Press has a reputation for producing excellent quality print and providing a service to meet even the most exacting standards. We specialise in bound publications such as books, journals and magazines, brochures, catalogues and directories. We have two B1 litho presses providing 5-colour and 8-colour printing. Extensive digital printing facilities provide added flexibility with three HP Indigo cut sheet digital colour presses plus a further two colour digital presses and three mono digital presses, including one web-fed. Our on-site bindery division, Hammonds provides comprehensive print finishing and bookbinding services, together with in-house mailing services, completes the package. Additionally, Hammonds offers printers a full trade finishing service including folding printed flat sheets or binding from printed folded sheets in PUR, perfect, case, saddle stitched, wiro or spiral bound finishes, plus section sewing, trimming, creasing, laminating, foil blocking, and much more... All clients are allocated an experienced Account Manager to handle the work throughout and provide technical guidance where needed, ensuring excellent communication and brilliant customer service for every job, no matter how big or small. From a single copy to 100,000 copies, we provide an ISO 9001 quality and ISO 14001 environmentally accredited service, with FSC certification too. Why not contact us to discuss your requirements or for a competitive quote on your next print project?

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Precision Ink Corporation

151 Stanley Street, Elk Grove Village, IL, 60007, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Precision Ink Corporation was founded in 2009 with the vision of becoming the premier producer of printing inks and coatings supplying printing organizations across the country. Located 18 miles outside of Chicago in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, we are strategically positioned to efficiently service the needs of our customers. Our Elk Grove Village manufacturing facility is dedicated to producing high performance inks and coatings. This facility utilizes proprietary formulations and modern equipment to supply our customers with an unparalleled combination of superior products, service and support. As a well capitalized company we relentlessly search for ways to improve. Continued sales growth has been balanced by continued investment in manufacturing capacity. In 2017 capacity expansion projects brought our manufacturing capacity to over 10,000,000 pounds of ink and 2,000,000 pounds of coating annually. Significant investments in product development equipment and staff is at the core of our strategy for success. Fully equipped labs staffed with skilled formulators give Precision Ink a competitive edge by insuring that our products consistently exceed our customer’s expectations. Experience The Difference. Experience Precision Ink.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlesworth-press-&-hammonds.jpeg
Charlesworth Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/precision-ink-corporation.jpeg
Precision Ink Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charlesworth Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Precision Ink Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlesworth Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Precision Ink Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Charlesworth Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlesworth Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Precision Ink Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Precision Ink Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charlesworth-press-&-hammonds.jpeg
Charlesworth Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/precision-ink-corporation.jpeg
Precision Ink Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Precision Ink Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charlesworth Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Precision Ink Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charlesworth Press company.

In the current year, Precision Ink Corporation company and Charlesworth Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Precision Ink Corporation company nor Charlesworth Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Precision Ink Corporation company nor Charlesworth Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Precision Ink Corporation company nor Charlesworth Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charlesworth Press company nor Precision Ink Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charlesworth Press nor Precision Ink Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charlesworth Press company nor Precision Ink Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Charlesworth Press company employs more people globally than Precision Ink Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Charlesworth Press nor Precision Ink Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charlesworth Press nor Precision Ink Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charlesworth Press nor Precision Ink Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charlesworth Press nor Precision Ink Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charlesworth Press nor Precision Ink Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charlesworth Press nor Precision Ink Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L