Comparison Overview

Charleston Symphony

VS

Seattle Opera

Charleston Symphony

480 East Bay Street, Charleston, SC, 29403, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://charlestonsymphony.org

Founded in 1936, the Charleston Symphony has grown into one of the largest full-time performing arts organizations in South Carolina. The CSO presents more than 150 concerts and educational activities every year, reaching more than 50,000 adults and students annually. Employing 36 full-time musicians, artistic personnel, and administrative staff, the Charleston Symphony’s mission is to inspire and engage our community through exceptional musical experiences and educational offerings.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Seattle Opera

1020 John Street, Seattle, WA, US, 98109
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.seattleopera.org

Founded in 1963, Seattle Opera is a leading American opera company. The company presents the classics of the European repertoire as well as new works of American opera. Seattle Opera performs five operas per year. Seattle Opera strives to produce musically extraordinary, theatrically compelling operas, employing uniformly high quality casts, dramatically aware conductors, and innovative yet textually concerned directors and designers. By continuing our emphasis on the work of Richard Wagner and by achieving national and international recognition for the quality of all our programming, Seattle Opera commits itself to advancing the cultural life of the Pacific Northwest through education and performance.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Charleston Symphony
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle-opera.jpeg
Seattle Opera
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charleston Symphony
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seattle Opera
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charleston Symphony in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seattle Opera in 2025.

Incident History — Charleston Symphony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charleston Symphony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seattle Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seattle Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Charleston Symphony
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle-opera.jpeg
Seattle Opera
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Charleston Symphony company and Seattle Opera company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Seattle Opera company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charleston Symphony company.

In the current year, Seattle Opera company and Charleston Symphony company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seattle Opera company nor Charleston Symphony company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seattle Opera company nor Charleston Symphony company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seattle Opera company nor Charleston Symphony company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charleston Symphony company nor Seattle Opera company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charleston Symphony nor Seattle Opera holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charleston Symphony company nor Seattle Opera company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Seattle Opera company employs more people globally than Charleston Symphony company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Charleston Symphony nor Seattle Opera holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charleston Symphony nor Seattle Opera holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charleston Symphony nor Seattle Opera holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charleston Symphony nor Seattle Opera holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charleston Symphony nor Seattle Opera holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charleston Symphony nor Seattle Opera holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References