Comparison Overview

Charleston Forge

VS

Mimi London Inc

Charleston Forge

251 Industrial Park Drive, Boone, NC, 28607, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.charlestonforge.com

We have a long and proud history of creating beautiful, hand-built furniture using steel, wood, glass, stone, and leather. We combine age-old blacksmithing techniques with contemporary designs to create furniture that literally lasts for generations. We started in 1984 in Boone, North Carolina, with a commitment to providing great products and outstanding customer service — something that we’re proud to say we still accomplish daily. The skill and experience of our employees give our company the capability to offer more than 300 products in a range of styles and the versatility to handle hundreds of custom projects each year.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mimi London Inc

8687 Melrose Ave, West Hollywood, 90069, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mimilondon.com/

The Mimi London philosophy has, and continues to be, to create, curate and offer some of the most unique and beautiful collections in the design industry. Style, form, beauty and comfort join our founding mission of responsibly sourcing our materials and methods to protect our environment and planet. Our focus is on organically-inspired luxury-- in our own collection and of those artisans that we represent. Bespoke, made-to-order products, all with a soulful touch, paired with highly-personalized service are the hallmarks of our company.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-forge.jpeg
Charleston Forge
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Mimi London Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charleston Forge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mimi London Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charleston Forge in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mimi London Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Charleston Forge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charleston Forge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mimi London Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mimi London Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-forge.jpeg
Charleston Forge
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Mimi London Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mimi London Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charleston Forge company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mimi London Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charleston Forge company.

In the current year, Mimi London Inc company and Charleston Forge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mimi London Inc company nor Charleston Forge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mimi London Inc company nor Charleston Forge company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mimi London Inc company nor Charleston Forge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charleston Forge company nor Mimi London Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Mimi London Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charleston Forge company nor Mimi London Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Charleston Forge company employs more people globally than Mimi London Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Mimi London Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Mimi London Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Mimi London Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Mimi London Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Mimi London Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Mimi London Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References