Comparison Overview

Charleston Forge

VS

Alfred Williams & Company

Charleston Forge

251 Industrial Park Drive, Boone, NC, 28607, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

We have a long and proud history of creating beautiful, hand-built furniture using steel, wood, glass, stone, and leather. We combine age-old blacksmithing techniques with contemporary designs to create furniture that literally lasts for generations. We started in 1984 in Boone, North Carolina, with a commitment to providing great products and outstanding customer service — something that we’re proud to say we still accomplish daily. The skill and experience of our employees give our company the capability to offer more than 300 products in a range of styles and the versatility to handle hundreds of custom projects each year.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alfred Williams & Company

410 S. Salisbury St., Raleigh, NC - North Carolina, 27601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

A leader in workplace strategy, placemaking, office furnishings and pre-constructed solutions, we have grown to become one of the largest MillerKnoll Dealers in North America. The size and the strength of our partner relationships gives us the capacity to deliver projects of any size to our clients in their locations throughout the United States.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 274
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-forge.jpeg
Charleston Forge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alfred-williams-&-company.jpeg
Alfred Williams & Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charleston Forge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alfred Williams & Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charleston Forge in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alfred Williams & Company in 2025.

Incident History — Charleston Forge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charleston Forge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alfred Williams & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alfred Williams & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charleston-forge.jpeg
Charleston Forge
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alfred-williams-&-company.jpeg
Alfred Williams & Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alfred Williams & Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charleston Forge company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alfred Williams & Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charleston Forge company.

In the current year, Alfred Williams & Company company and Charleston Forge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alfred Williams & Company company nor Charleston Forge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alfred Williams & Company company nor Charleston Forge company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alfred Williams & Company company nor Charleston Forge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charleston Forge company nor Alfred Williams & Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Alfred Williams & Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charleston Forge company nor Alfred Williams & Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alfred Williams & Company company employs more people globally than Charleston Forge company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Alfred Williams & Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Alfred Williams & Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Alfred Williams & Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Alfred Williams & Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Alfred Williams & Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charleston Forge nor Alfred Williams & Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.