Comparison Overview

Charles River Laboratories

VS

The National Institutes of Health

Charles River Laboratories

251 Ballardvale Street, Wilmington, Massachusetts, 01887, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

At Charles River, we are guided by our strong purpose—to create healthier lives—which centers around the patients who rely on the therapeutics we help to develop, the animals in our care, to our planet, and to the passionate and skilled people who are at the heart of our organization and make it all possible. #DrugDiscovery #Biotech #Biotechnology #Pharmaceuticals #CRL

NAICS: 541714
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees: 14,665
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The National Institutes of Health

9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, US, 20892
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

NIH is the only agency of its kind. We impact the health of the country and the world through unique and innovative medical research. Did you know that NIH is the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world, investing more than $32 billion a year to enhance life, and reduce illness and disability? NIH funded research has led to breakthroughs and new treatments, helping people live longer, healthier lives, and building the research foundation that drives discovery. Whether you are graduating with a bachelor's degree, working on your doctoral degree, entering the workforce for the first time, or changing careers, NIH offers a place for you to start and plenty of room to grow your career. When you join us, you’re not just advancing your career — you’re driving the health of our country forward. Official LinkedIn Account of the NIH. Privacy policy: http://go.usa.gov/x9svN Comment policy: https://bit.ly/3G6xq94 Engagement ≠ endorsement

NAICS: 541714
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees: 29,850
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-river-laboratories.jpeg
Charles River Laboratories
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-institutes-of-health.jpeg
The National Institutes of Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charles River Laboratories
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The National Institutes of Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles River Laboratories in 2025.

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The National Institutes of Health in 2025.

Incident History — Charles River Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles River Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The National Institutes of Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The National Institutes of Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-river-laboratories.jpeg
Charles River Laboratories
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-institutes-of-health.jpeg
The National Institutes of Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The National Institutes of Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Charles River Laboratories company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The National Institutes of Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charles River Laboratories company.

In the current year, The National Institutes of Health company and Charles River Laboratories company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The National Institutes of Health company nor Charles River Laboratories company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The National Institutes of Health company nor Charles River Laboratories company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The National Institutes of Health company nor Charles River Laboratories company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charles River Laboratories company nor The National Institutes of Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charles River Laboratories nor The National Institutes of Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The National Institutes of Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Charles River Laboratories company.

The National Institutes of Health company employs more people globally than Charles River Laboratories company, reflecting its scale as a Biotechnology Research.

Neither Charles River Laboratories nor The National Institutes of Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charles River Laboratories nor The National Institutes of Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charles River Laboratories nor The National Institutes of Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charles River Laboratories nor The National Institutes of Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charles River Laboratories nor The National Institutes of Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charles River Laboratories nor The National Institutes of Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X