Comparison Overview

Charles Injury Law

VS

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.

Charles Injury Law

930 S State Road 7, Plantation, 33317, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Charles Injury Law is a personal injury law firm that offers personal injury representation throughout Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties. Its managing attorney, Steve Charles, Esq. is admitted to the Florida Bar and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This firm specializes in personal injury, car accident, truck accident, slip & fall and premise liability. We offer affordable rates that fit any budget. Services are available in English, Creole, French and Spanish.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.

123 Justison St., Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. (“G&E”) concentrates on complex financial litigation, focusing on U.S. and international securities class actions and opt-out litigation, corporate governance matters under Delaware law, consumer protection litigation, public entity representation, complex pharmaceutical and medical device litigation, false claims, environmental tort and disaster litigation, antitrust, bankruptcy, intellectual property, civil rights, and birth injury litigation. In almost a quarter century of representing institutional investors, the firm has consistently achieved stellar results for its clients. After the enactment of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) of 1995, G&E achieved national recognition in representing institutional investors, particularly public employee pension funds, in federal securities fraud and related litigation. G&E has been lead counsel in some of the largest securities class actions in history and achieved the largest settlement in the history of the Delaware Chancery Court. G&E has twice been named as one of the top firms for shareholder recovery by RiskMetrics Group and has earned a place in The National Law Journal’s "Plaintiffs’ Hot List Hall of Fame."​ The firm is listed as one of America’s Leading Business Lawyers by Chambers and Partners, reporting that G&E “commanded respect for its representation of institutional investors in shareholder and derivative actions, and in federal securities fraud litigation.”

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 169
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-legal-pllc.jpeg
Charles Injury Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grant-and-eisenhofer.jpeg
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charles Injury Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles Injury Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Charles Injury Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles Injury Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-legal-pllc.jpeg
Charles Injury Law
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grant-and-eisenhofer.jpeg
Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Charles Injury Law company and Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charles Injury Law company.

In the current year, Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company and Charles Injury Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company nor Charles Injury Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company nor Charles Injury Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company nor Charles Injury Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charles Injury Law company nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charles Injury Law company nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. company employs more people globally than Charles Injury Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X