Comparison Overview

Charles Injury Law

VS

Buying Legal Council

Charles Injury Law

930 S State Road 7, Plantation, 33317, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Charles Injury Law is a personal injury law firm that offers personal injury representation throughout Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties. Its managing attorney, Steve Charles, Esq. is admitted to the Florida Bar and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This firm specializes in personal injury, car accident, truck accident, slip & fall and premise liability. We offer affordable rates that fit any budget. Services are available in English, Creole, French and Spanish.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Buying Legal Council

New York, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Our mission is to advance the field of legal services and legal technology, enhance the value and performance of legal procurement practitioners and their organizations, foster dialogue between buyers and sellers, and document and promote best practices. We identify and provide solutions to both strategic and operational challenges our members face and prepare them for tomorrow’s opportunities and challenges. The Buying Legal Council facilitates an innovative dialogue between buyers and sellers of legal services, as well as other stakeholders in the legal market.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-legal-pllc.jpeg
Charles Injury Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Charles Injury Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Buying Legal Council
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles Injury Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buying Legal Council in 2025.

Incident History — Charles Injury Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles Injury Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Buying Legal Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buying Legal Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/charles-legal-pllc.jpeg
Charles Injury Law
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buying-legal-council.jpeg
Buying Legal Council
Incidents

FAQ

Charles Injury Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Buying Legal Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Buying Legal Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Charles Injury Law company.

In the current year, Buying Legal Council company and Charles Injury Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Buying Legal Council company nor Charles Injury Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Buying Legal Council company nor Charles Injury Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Buying Legal Council company nor Charles Injury Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Charles Injury Law company nor Buying Legal Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Buying Legal Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Charles Injury Law company nor Buying Legal Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Buying Legal Council company employs more people globally than Charles Injury Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Buying Legal Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Buying Legal Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Buying Legal Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Buying Legal Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Buying Legal Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Charles Injury Law nor Buying Legal Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X